Feed aggregator
CofV 12.4: Distinguishing Social and Asocial
There might be one more in this series, might have to write about time and distance.
What follows combines with everything before, but especially with the other elements in 12.0-12.3.
12- Identifying Danger
12.1- Adrenaline Signs
12.2- You
12.3- Terrain
In some ways this all comes close to the Intent-Means-Opportunity triangle. An immediate threat has to have all three. Most of the time, you are the resource, the source of intent. the threat is his or her own means and the terrain and your behaviors supply the opportunity. But that's kind of simplistic.
Social and asocial are done for different reasons and so they have different requirements, from the bad guy's point of view. The primary difference is that in most cases, social violence requires an audience. For asocial violence the audience magically turns into witnesses. Some of the types of social, like the bonding GMD, are social within the group but asocial between the group and victim. And some, maybe most, bad guys will try to get social benefits from asocial crimes (bragging about a mugging, for instance) or vice versa (going through the other guy's pockets after winning a Monkey Dance.)
So that's the big one. Presence of others: generally social. Absence of witnesses: generally asocial. Presence of a bonded group and you are alone: bad day for you.
Exception: certain types of predatory acts do use the crowds as camouflage. But by their nature, they can't be extended scenarios.
Second, the behaviors are different. Social behaviors, even if they are going to violence, are normal. We perceive them as normal because they stay on a script that we all know. One of the things that makes predators so effective is that:
1) We are wired to assume and expect the scripts (corollary: when someone is clearly going off script most victims don't recognize it)
2) Many, especially the socially skilled and especially sexual predators, mask their predatory tactics in the social scripts. For instance, there is a natural progression in romance where a couple meet, enjoy each other and gradually want to spend longer times in more privacy. Which is also exactly what a process predator wants. Predators learn to accelerate the natural process.
For our purposes, I'll call the social behaviors (including the social violence behaviors) 'normal.' People don't consciously recognize normal, and without that recognition, abnormal (predatory) behavior is often missed, dismissed or excused. Missed- not seen at all. Dismissed- seen, but ignored as unimportant. Excused- acknowledged as odd but doesn't count because there is probably a perfectly good reason. So victims either don't see or ignore the warning signs.
Aside- One of the secret deeper reasons that I teach SD law as an articulation class instead of a decision making class is that if the person can explain things to a jury, they can also explain why they need to act to themselves in the critical seconds. That helps some people slip the leash.
So you have to know normal consciously before you can recognize abnormal.
Basics are proxemics, facing and stance, hands and structure, and group behavior.
Normal proxemics varies widely across different cultures. In North America and most of the places in Europe that I've visited, the comfortable distance for a stranger to stand is about a half pace beyond arms reach. You will get a creepy feeling if people stand too close and you will elicit a creepy feeling if you approach inside the bubble. It's an easy experiment to do. This distance changes with intimacy. Acquaintances are slightly closer, friends closer than that and intimates very close. And there is a very particular range+eye contact that you will see with cons who have done prison time together-- standing very close but looking past each other's shoulder.
This bubble is not round. It's best to feel this rather than read it, but that creepy feeling isn't engendered by a stranger approaching from the side until he is much closer. Well within striking range. It is even closer behind. This is why we can handle stadium seating and sitting together on buses, but tables are a certain width.
The normal approach is to stand in front of you at the edge of the bubble. An experienced predator will, while acting friendly and social, generally approach from the flank to be in striking range. (Not addressing ambushes from the rear, only the stuff you can see coming.) So, normal is from the front, out of range. Anything else should put you on alert. But remember this is very different in different cultures. If you try to insist on your bubble in Arabia or South America do not expect to make friends or be accepted. There are profound tactical reasons for maintaining a certain distance but sometimes the strategic reasons trump the tactical. And remember, you are looking at signs of abnormality for danger, and normal/abnormal is measured from the threat's conditioning, not yours. Someone from a close culture who maintains distance may read as sensible to you, but he might well do it because of mental illness or excessive aggression.
Facing and stance. The normal monkey dance fighting stance is one of the stupidest possible ways to stand for fighting. The combatants tend to be up on their toes, bouncing, arms akimbo and with feet and hips perpendicular (side to side) to the threat. And usually tense with muscles bulging. Slow, stupid, no base and with targets exposed. It is an attempt to look big, like a cat puffing out its fur. Understand that even well trained martial artists also tend to do this if they get their ego involved. It's an emotional reaction and is the default if you respond emotionally. It is profoundly inefficient.
Almost all normal (social) interactions will have that foot position. Social violence will have the crappy posture and foot position but will violate the bubble from the front.
A predator will blade up. He will have his power in line with his target (you). One of the elements that people miss, ignore or dismiss is that he may keep his shoulders and hips square with his feet bladed. feet are important, not the rest. The other thing is that if the threat approaches from the flank and faces the same direction as you it feels friendly (facing the same direction mirrors your body language) and the feet are naturally positioned for the power to be in line with the target.
Inexperienced predators may not know this. Early crimes it is common for the threat to have no more experience than you do. (He will get mentored later, or learn by trial and error). So you may be mugged by someone giving all the signals of social violence (up on toes, shitty stance, loud) but with a gun. Is a gun part of normal Monkey Dance behavior? No it is not. Therefor this is abnormal therefor probably predatory. And this situation is very touchy. Resource predation plus a fragile ego and a firearm is a recipe for disaster. If the threat feels endangered or disrespected he will erupt.
That's feet. Next hands. If there is a weapon, that tells you two things. First, this is a potentially very bad day and second, he wanted you to see it for a reason. If you live in a weapon culture, you know the rules of social violence (dueling) in that culture better than I do. In my culture, monkey dances don't involve guns or knives. If a weapon is involved it is either a predator or someone who was recently humiliated in a Monkey Dance trying to get his manhood back.
Aside-- Do what you need to do to survive, but never humiliate any one. It never serves any purpose other than to stroke your own ego.
If a hand is out of sight, it could be good or bad. No one keeps a straight arm with a hand hidden behind a thigh. No one just rests his hand on his back hip under his jacket. But a lot of people stand with their hands in their back pockets and a flat hand like that means they feel no threat. (This is a stacking point here: unusual body positioning plus signs of adrenaline? Big red flag. An alert individual showing extremely relaxed body language in a clearly dangerous situation? Big red flag.)
Precursor moves. Most people, for whatever reason don't just hit. They pull back first. They think it feels more powerful. This chambering or loading is often disguised as turning away or glancing around-- and that last sweeping glance of the area is a final witness check just before things go down.
Groups and places. If there are only two people at a bus stop and they are strangers, they keep distance. All guys know the urinal rules. There is a pattern to where people stand and which direction they face as an elevator fills. People that know each other stand together and talk. If they see you, go quiet and split up, that's likely bad.
So with groups you look for coordinated movement, any separation that makes you the apex of a triangle or any static positioning that makes you walk between two people. In pack behavior you look for groups (usually young men) moving purposefully or trying to intimidate/get a reaction from others.
All of this could be expanded, but these are the basics.
What follows combines with everything before, but especially with the other elements in 12.0-12.3.
12- Identifying Danger
12.1- Adrenaline Signs
12.2- You
12.3- Terrain
In some ways this all comes close to the Intent-Means-Opportunity triangle. An immediate threat has to have all three. Most of the time, you are the resource, the source of intent. the threat is his or her own means and the terrain and your behaviors supply the opportunity. But that's kind of simplistic.
Social and asocial are done for different reasons and so they have different requirements, from the bad guy's point of view. The primary difference is that in most cases, social violence requires an audience. For asocial violence the audience magically turns into witnesses. Some of the types of social, like the bonding GMD, are social within the group but asocial between the group and victim. And some, maybe most, bad guys will try to get social benefits from asocial crimes (bragging about a mugging, for instance) or vice versa (going through the other guy's pockets after winning a Monkey Dance.)
So that's the big one. Presence of others: generally social. Absence of witnesses: generally asocial. Presence of a bonded group and you are alone: bad day for you.
Exception: certain types of predatory acts do use the crowds as camouflage. But by their nature, they can't be extended scenarios.
Second, the behaviors are different. Social behaviors, even if they are going to violence, are normal. We perceive them as normal because they stay on a script that we all know. One of the things that makes predators so effective is that:
1) We are wired to assume and expect the scripts (corollary: when someone is clearly going off script most victims don't recognize it)
2) Many, especially the socially skilled and especially sexual predators, mask their predatory tactics in the social scripts. For instance, there is a natural progression in romance where a couple meet, enjoy each other and gradually want to spend longer times in more privacy. Which is also exactly what a process predator wants. Predators learn to accelerate the natural process.
For our purposes, I'll call the social behaviors (including the social violence behaviors) 'normal.' People don't consciously recognize normal, and without that recognition, abnormal (predatory) behavior is often missed, dismissed or excused. Missed- not seen at all. Dismissed- seen, but ignored as unimportant. Excused- acknowledged as odd but doesn't count because there is probably a perfectly good reason. So victims either don't see or ignore the warning signs.
Aside- One of the secret deeper reasons that I teach SD law as an articulation class instead of a decision making class is that if the person can explain things to a jury, they can also explain why they need to act to themselves in the critical seconds. That helps some people slip the leash.
So you have to know normal consciously before you can recognize abnormal.
Basics are proxemics, facing and stance, hands and structure, and group behavior.
Normal proxemics varies widely across different cultures. In North America and most of the places in Europe that I've visited, the comfortable distance for a stranger to stand is about a half pace beyond arms reach. You will get a creepy feeling if people stand too close and you will elicit a creepy feeling if you approach inside the bubble. It's an easy experiment to do. This distance changes with intimacy. Acquaintances are slightly closer, friends closer than that and intimates very close. And there is a very particular range+eye contact that you will see with cons who have done prison time together-- standing very close but looking past each other's shoulder.
This bubble is not round. It's best to feel this rather than read it, but that creepy feeling isn't engendered by a stranger approaching from the side until he is much closer. Well within striking range. It is even closer behind. This is why we can handle stadium seating and sitting together on buses, but tables are a certain width.
The normal approach is to stand in front of you at the edge of the bubble. An experienced predator will, while acting friendly and social, generally approach from the flank to be in striking range. (Not addressing ambushes from the rear, only the stuff you can see coming.) So, normal is from the front, out of range. Anything else should put you on alert. But remember this is very different in different cultures. If you try to insist on your bubble in Arabia or South America do not expect to make friends or be accepted. There are profound tactical reasons for maintaining a certain distance but sometimes the strategic reasons trump the tactical. And remember, you are looking at signs of abnormality for danger, and normal/abnormal is measured from the threat's conditioning, not yours. Someone from a close culture who maintains distance may read as sensible to you, but he might well do it because of mental illness or excessive aggression.
Facing and stance. The normal monkey dance fighting stance is one of the stupidest possible ways to stand for fighting. The combatants tend to be up on their toes, bouncing, arms akimbo and with feet and hips perpendicular (side to side) to the threat. And usually tense with muscles bulging. Slow, stupid, no base and with targets exposed. It is an attempt to look big, like a cat puffing out its fur. Understand that even well trained martial artists also tend to do this if they get their ego involved. It's an emotional reaction and is the default if you respond emotionally. It is profoundly inefficient.
Almost all normal (social) interactions will have that foot position. Social violence will have the crappy posture and foot position but will violate the bubble from the front.
A predator will blade up. He will have his power in line with his target (you). One of the elements that people miss, ignore or dismiss is that he may keep his shoulders and hips square with his feet bladed. feet are important, not the rest. The other thing is that if the threat approaches from the flank and faces the same direction as you it feels friendly (facing the same direction mirrors your body language) and the feet are naturally positioned for the power to be in line with the target.
Inexperienced predators may not know this. Early crimes it is common for the threat to have no more experience than you do. (He will get mentored later, or learn by trial and error). So you may be mugged by someone giving all the signals of social violence (up on toes, shitty stance, loud) but with a gun. Is a gun part of normal Monkey Dance behavior? No it is not. Therefor this is abnormal therefor probably predatory. And this situation is very touchy. Resource predation plus a fragile ego and a firearm is a recipe for disaster. If the threat feels endangered or disrespected he will erupt.
That's feet. Next hands. If there is a weapon, that tells you two things. First, this is a potentially very bad day and second, he wanted you to see it for a reason. If you live in a weapon culture, you know the rules of social violence (dueling) in that culture better than I do. In my culture, monkey dances don't involve guns or knives. If a weapon is involved it is either a predator or someone who was recently humiliated in a Monkey Dance trying to get his manhood back.
Aside-- Do what you need to do to survive, but never humiliate any one. It never serves any purpose other than to stroke your own ego.
If a hand is out of sight, it could be good or bad. No one keeps a straight arm with a hand hidden behind a thigh. No one just rests his hand on his back hip under his jacket. But a lot of people stand with their hands in their back pockets and a flat hand like that means they feel no threat. (This is a stacking point here: unusual body positioning plus signs of adrenaline? Big red flag. An alert individual showing extremely relaxed body language in a clearly dangerous situation? Big red flag.)
Precursor moves. Most people, for whatever reason don't just hit. They pull back first. They think it feels more powerful. This chambering or loading is often disguised as turning away or glancing around-- and that last sweeping glance of the area is a final witness check just before things go down.
Groups and places. If there are only two people at a bus stop and they are strangers, they keep distance. All guys know the urinal rules. There is a pattern to where people stand and which direction they face as an elevator fills. People that know each other stand together and talk. If they see you, go quiet and split up, that's likely bad.
So with groups you look for coordinated movement, any separation that makes you the apex of a triangle or any static positioning that makes you walk between two people. In pack behavior you look for groups (usually young men) moving purposefully or trying to intimidate/get a reaction from others.
All of this could be expanded, but these are the basics.
WHEN YOU WISH UPON A STAR
WHEN YOU WISH UPON A STAR
"Always remember, your focus determines your reality."
Qui-Gon (Star Wars: Episode 1-The Phantom Menace)
In Space No One Can Hear You Scream
ALIEN (1979)
The universe is ancient, (estimated to be 13.7 billion years old, having formed from an ultra-hot, ultra-dense singularity), and it is freezing, (temperatures in space can dip down to 2.73 Kelvin or -270 celsius). There is still so much that scientists do not yet understand about space. Are there multiple universes? Does the death of one universe lead to the birth of another? Much of the matter in the universe is "dark matter," invisible to our eyes and to our high tech instruments, and the greatest amount of energy in the universe, an energy which pervades all of space and forces the galaxies away from each other at increasingly greater and greater speeds, is mysterious "dark energy."
So the universe is big and getting bigger, it's cold and getting colder, and it's old and getting older. I see the universe as a lifeless, uncaring, unsympathetic, unimaginably vast and almost empty space.
But here's what's got me confused: Some people actually believe that if you will "throw out vibrations" into the universe, the universe will respond. People travel the country, appear on talk shows, and write best-selling books teaching others how to get their wishes fulfilled with help from this cold, mindless universe.
It's called "The Law of Attraction," and, dig this, the Universe can even help you decide what's for dinner.
How does it work? Well, says askingtheuniverse.net, "The Universe delivers manifestations in the form of insights, hunches and coincidences. It brings you together with just the right people at just the right time. Your Universe is here to help! There are big things, little things and all manner of other things that affect your life. But you have the power of your Universe to help guide you through the maze. If you want clarity with a foggy issue, ask the Universe. If you need strength to carry on, ask the Universe. Even if you can't decide what to have for dinner, ask the Universe."
Here's how Bob Proctor explains the Law of Attraction: "This is an orderly universe. Nothing happens by accident. The images you plant in your marvelous mind instantly set up an attractive force, which governs the results in your life."
Melody Fletcher says that "The Law of Attraction states that you manifest anything you give enough focus to. By giving your attention to a thought, you activate that thought's vibration, and the Law of Attraction will cause more vibrations like it to be drawn to it. Once enough energy is gathered, the vibration becomes physical."
Chris Ankele says you don't just ask...you can command the universe to give you what you want. All you have to do, says Ankele, is "Close your eyes, live your experience, breathe it, see it, pretend it is real. Remember to be as specific as possible; do not hold any details back even ones you would be afraid to admit that you included. That will start the vibrations and you are on your way to bending the universe to your demands."
If this all seems just a little silly, consider that it may just be a matter of coping with the ugly truth of reality. Eugene Subbotsky says that it's "much more comfortable to think that your fate is written down in a constellation of stars than that you're one of a certain group of intelligent animals who are lost in frozen space forever."
Psychologist Carol Nemeroff thinks it's nothing but magical thinking. She says that we all subscribe to it at different levels, "Most of me doesn't believe but some of me does."
Maybe magical thinking--mystical hunches and intuitive decisions, superstitions and fear of the unknown, the search for talismans, signs, and omens, trying to read the thoughts and intentions of man and beast, the use of ritual words and actions and the use of incantations or sacrifice to placate or seek the favor of the gods, attempts at discerning the future, and the belief that we are all powerless against fate--were all aspects of our early survival. Care givers before the advent of modern medicine may have intuitively understood the importance of suggestion, and faith healing like other placebo treatments, may help a patient feel better and recover sooner.
"Survival requires recognizing patterns," says Matthew Hutson in Psychology Today, "night follows day, berries that color will make you ill. And because missing the obvious often hurts more than seeing the imaginary, our skills at inferring connections are overtuned. No one told Wade Boggs that eating chicken before every single game would help his batting average; he decided that on his own, and no one can argue with his success. We look for patterns because we hate surprises and because we love being in control."
Wishing and hoping seems to be the most basic form of magical thinking. We cross our fingers as the contest winners are announced, we shout out the horses in the Kentucky Derby urging them to run faster, and we wave our hands in the air when we release a bowling ball as if our thoughts had energy and force. We want to give ourselves what David Ropeik says is the "illusion that we have some control over what is going to happen, a reassuring sense that we can in fact steer our flimsy boat against the stormy winds and currents of fate."
Sonja Lyubomirsky has even considered an experiment to show that the supposed effects of the Law of Attraction are not that miraculous at all. Here’s how she describes the potential study: "Half the participants will be asked to practice faithfully the law of attraction. The other half will be asked to practice an alternate 'law of attraction' that we have randomly scrambled and reversed beyond recognition. All will be given a reasonable-sounding rationale for why their assigned exercises should work."
Her prediction? "Both groups of participants will become happier over time and more successful in obtaining what they want – simply because they believe in what they’re doing, because they expect to succeed, because they are putting effort into the strategy, and because they are pursuing it in an engaged and committed fashion."
In Part 2 we'll take a look at how magical thinking and aspects of the law of attraction have entered into the dojo and our martial arts training.
"Always remember, your focus determines your reality."
Qui-Gon (Star Wars: Episode 1-The Phantom Menace)
In Space No One Can Hear You Scream
ALIEN (1979)
The universe is ancient, (estimated to be 13.7 billion years old, having formed from an ultra-hot, ultra-dense singularity), and it is freezing, (temperatures in space can dip down to 2.73 Kelvin or -270 celsius). There is still so much that scientists do not yet understand about space. Are there multiple universes? Does the death of one universe lead to the birth of another? Much of the matter in the universe is "dark matter," invisible to our eyes and to our high tech instruments, and the greatest amount of energy in the universe, an energy which pervades all of space and forces the galaxies away from each other at increasingly greater and greater speeds, is mysterious "dark energy."
So the universe is big and getting bigger, it's cold and getting colder, and it's old and getting older. I see the universe as a lifeless, uncaring, unsympathetic, unimaginably vast and almost empty space.
But here's what's got me confused: Some people actually believe that if you will "throw out vibrations" into the universe, the universe will respond. People travel the country, appear on talk shows, and write best-selling books teaching others how to get their wishes fulfilled with help from this cold, mindless universe.
It's called "The Law of Attraction," and, dig this, the Universe can even help you decide what's for dinner.
How does it work? Well, says askingtheuniverse.net, "The Universe delivers manifestations in the form of insights, hunches and coincidences. It brings you together with just the right people at just the right time. Your Universe is here to help! There are big things, little things and all manner of other things that affect your life. But you have the power of your Universe to help guide you through the maze. If you want clarity with a foggy issue, ask the Universe. If you need strength to carry on, ask the Universe. Even if you can't decide what to have for dinner, ask the Universe."
Here's how Bob Proctor explains the Law of Attraction: "This is an orderly universe. Nothing happens by accident. The images you plant in your marvelous mind instantly set up an attractive force, which governs the results in your life."
Melody Fletcher says that "The Law of Attraction states that you manifest anything you give enough focus to. By giving your attention to a thought, you activate that thought's vibration, and the Law of Attraction will cause more vibrations like it to be drawn to it. Once enough energy is gathered, the vibration becomes physical."
Chris Ankele says you don't just ask...you can command the universe to give you what you want. All you have to do, says Ankele, is "Close your eyes, live your experience, breathe it, see it, pretend it is real. Remember to be as specific as possible; do not hold any details back even ones you would be afraid to admit that you included. That will start the vibrations and you are on your way to bending the universe to your demands."
If this all seems just a little silly, consider that it may just be a matter of coping with the ugly truth of reality. Eugene Subbotsky says that it's "much more comfortable to think that your fate is written down in a constellation of stars than that you're one of a certain group of intelligent animals who are lost in frozen space forever."
Psychologist Carol Nemeroff thinks it's nothing but magical thinking. She says that we all subscribe to it at different levels, "Most of me doesn't believe but some of me does."
Maybe magical thinking--mystical hunches and intuitive decisions, superstitions and fear of the unknown, the search for talismans, signs, and omens, trying to read the thoughts and intentions of man and beast, the use of ritual words and actions and the use of incantations or sacrifice to placate or seek the favor of the gods, attempts at discerning the future, and the belief that we are all powerless against fate--were all aspects of our early survival. Care givers before the advent of modern medicine may have intuitively understood the importance of suggestion, and faith healing like other placebo treatments, may help a patient feel better and recover sooner.
"Survival requires recognizing patterns," says Matthew Hutson in Psychology Today, "night follows day, berries that color will make you ill. And because missing the obvious often hurts more than seeing the imaginary, our skills at inferring connections are overtuned. No one told Wade Boggs that eating chicken before every single game would help his batting average; he decided that on his own, and no one can argue with his success. We look for patterns because we hate surprises and because we love being in control."
Wishing and hoping seems to be the most basic form of magical thinking. We cross our fingers as the contest winners are announced, we shout out the horses in the Kentucky Derby urging them to run faster, and we wave our hands in the air when we release a bowling ball as if our thoughts had energy and force. We want to give ourselves what David Ropeik says is the "illusion that we have some control over what is going to happen, a reassuring sense that we can in fact steer our flimsy boat against the stormy winds and currents of fate."
Sonja Lyubomirsky has even considered an experiment to show that the supposed effects of the Law of Attraction are not that miraculous at all. Here’s how she describes the potential study: "Half the participants will be asked to practice faithfully the law of attraction. The other half will be asked to practice an alternate 'law of attraction' that we have randomly scrambled and reversed beyond recognition. All will be given a reasonable-sounding rationale for why their assigned exercises should work."
Her prediction? "Both groups of participants will become happier over time and more successful in obtaining what they want – simply because they believe in what they’re doing, because they expect to succeed, because they are putting effort into the strategy, and because they are pursuing it in an engaged and committed fashion."
In Part 2 we'll take a look at how magical thinking and aspects of the law of attraction have entered into the dojo and our martial arts training.
Qualified
Normal 0 0 1 703 4008 33 8 4922 11.518 0 0 0
There are no experts here.To recap the last post and the comments on the last post- A “High level conversations” isn’t a matter of knowledge or experience, not in this field. Knowledge and experience never hurt of course. Not ‘never.’ If the experience is overblown or misremembered or poorly extrapolated it can go bad. If the knowledge is of myth, folklore and received wisdom without a reality check the conversation could be very high-falutin’, but the information passed could be deadly.Here’s the deal. Extreme violence happens at the edge of what humans were evolved to handle. Much of it happens in contradiction to our early conditioning about reality. And it happens in a stew of stress hormones that affect perception, cognition and memory. My experience is that very few people experience enough serious violence that the lessons learned there replace social expectations. Even fewer experience enough to get a handle on the sensory and perception distortion. Only a percentage of those have the discipline, desire and/or job requirement to evaluate those distortions and compare them with the actual events (I will go on record as thankful for the hundreds of reports I had to write, though I hated them at the time).And of those few, the number that have experienced more than one very small piece of this big puzzle are vanishingly small. Soldiers learn part of it (different parts at different intensities depending on MOS and era); cops learn a different part; bouncers another part; targets for sexual assault a much different part. As do the night clerk at the local Stop-n-Rob or any of the actors in a domestic violence cycle. And cross a border or change the decade and many of the rules and social conventions of violence change.So one of the students at the Oakland seminar asked if he was qualified to teach. The sentiment was an echo of Pax in the comments on the last post.I don’t know what qualified means. The best handgun instructor I ever had has shot exactly one man. In the back. It wasn’t a gunfight. It wasn’t the way wannabe’s fantasize. A bad man needed to be shot to save the life of a third party and my instructor did it in the safest, smartest way.I can think of three (at least) of the top handgun instructors in the country who have never shot anyone. Does that make them unqualified? And some of their students have used the training and survived. How much does that mean, really?My jujutsu instructor, as far as I know, never went toe-to-toe with a PCP freak. But he gave me the confidence to do it and the skills to be successful. But one of the things Dave said, when I hit green belt and started questioning whether this stuff would really work: “I don’t know if jujutsu will work. But I know you. You’re a fighter and you’re adaptable. You’ll make it work.”And out of left field—my wife sometimes teaches belly dance and she’s used those concepts to vastly improve my understanding of body mechanics and increase my striking power. Movement is movement and movement experts of any kind can help you.So are you qualified? Depends. Can you make people better?One of my FB friends was assigned to do an essay on why he was a self-protection expert. It was essentially a self-esteem building exercise, and he did a good job… but I would encourage every SD instructor to write a little private essay on why they are notexperts. To get a start on the very long list of things that they do not know. It’s not only humbling, but it gives you a place to start when you need to learn.So, I don’t know qualified, but I can pick out unqualified in a heartbeat.If you are there for your ego instead of the student’s improvement, walk away.If you don’t know the basic context of modern self-defense (how attacks happen, SD law and the legal process, etc.) you aren’t ready to teach yet. And if you haven’t, on your own, recognized the need and started researching this stuff, you aren’t responsible enough to teach yet.If you think trying to teach martial artists to fight is the same as trying to teach a victim profile not to be targeted, you aren’t teaching what you think you are teaching.If you need to be top dog, you might be teaching people to win but you are conditioning them to lose. You are creating victims.If you think SD is primarily a physical skill, you don’t understand the basics.If you think your experience, whatever it is, qualifies you to talk authoritatively about things outside your experience, it’s a red flag.If your techniques require a martial athlete in top condition to work, they’re inappropriate for self-defense. And probably really inefficient.
The trouble with this list, of course, for those of you wondering about your qualifications is that they are much harder to see from inside your skin. You have to develop a group of honorable enemies.
There are no experts here.To recap the last post and the comments on the last post- A “High level conversations” isn’t a matter of knowledge or experience, not in this field. Knowledge and experience never hurt of course. Not ‘never.’ If the experience is overblown or misremembered or poorly extrapolated it can go bad. If the knowledge is of myth, folklore and received wisdom without a reality check the conversation could be very high-falutin’, but the information passed could be deadly.Here’s the deal. Extreme violence happens at the edge of what humans were evolved to handle. Much of it happens in contradiction to our early conditioning about reality. And it happens in a stew of stress hormones that affect perception, cognition and memory. My experience is that very few people experience enough serious violence that the lessons learned there replace social expectations. Even fewer experience enough to get a handle on the sensory and perception distortion. Only a percentage of those have the discipline, desire and/or job requirement to evaluate those distortions and compare them with the actual events (I will go on record as thankful for the hundreds of reports I had to write, though I hated them at the time).And of those few, the number that have experienced more than one very small piece of this big puzzle are vanishingly small. Soldiers learn part of it (different parts at different intensities depending on MOS and era); cops learn a different part; bouncers another part; targets for sexual assault a much different part. As do the night clerk at the local Stop-n-Rob or any of the actors in a domestic violence cycle. And cross a border or change the decade and many of the rules and social conventions of violence change.So one of the students at the Oakland seminar asked if he was qualified to teach. The sentiment was an echo of Pax in the comments on the last post.I don’t know what qualified means. The best handgun instructor I ever had has shot exactly one man. In the back. It wasn’t a gunfight. It wasn’t the way wannabe’s fantasize. A bad man needed to be shot to save the life of a third party and my instructor did it in the safest, smartest way.I can think of three (at least) of the top handgun instructors in the country who have never shot anyone. Does that make them unqualified? And some of their students have used the training and survived. How much does that mean, really?My jujutsu instructor, as far as I know, never went toe-to-toe with a PCP freak. But he gave me the confidence to do it and the skills to be successful. But one of the things Dave said, when I hit green belt and started questioning whether this stuff would really work: “I don’t know if jujutsu will work. But I know you. You’re a fighter and you’re adaptable. You’ll make it work.”And out of left field—my wife sometimes teaches belly dance and she’s used those concepts to vastly improve my understanding of body mechanics and increase my striking power. Movement is movement and movement experts of any kind can help you.So are you qualified? Depends. Can you make people better?One of my FB friends was assigned to do an essay on why he was a self-protection expert. It was essentially a self-esteem building exercise, and he did a good job… but I would encourage every SD instructor to write a little private essay on why they are notexperts. To get a start on the very long list of things that they do not know. It’s not only humbling, but it gives you a place to start when you need to learn.So, I don’t know qualified, but I can pick out unqualified in a heartbeat.If you are there for your ego instead of the student’s improvement, walk away.If you don’t know the basic context of modern self-defense (how attacks happen, SD law and the legal process, etc.) you aren’t ready to teach yet. And if you haven’t, on your own, recognized the need and started researching this stuff, you aren’t responsible enough to teach yet.If you think trying to teach martial artists to fight is the same as trying to teach a victim profile not to be targeted, you aren’t teaching what you think you are teaching.If you need to be top dog, you might be teaching people to win but you are conditioning them to lose. You are creating victims.If you think SD is primarily a physical skill, you don’t understand the basics.If you think your experience, whatever it is, qualifies you to talk authoritatively about things outside your experience, it’s a red flag.If your techniques require a martial athlete in top condition to work, they’re inappropriate for self-defense. And probably really inefficient.
The trouble with this list, of course, for those of you wondering about your qualifications is that they are much harder to see from inside your skin. You have to develop a group of honorable enemies.
At the Big Kid's Table
Normal 0 0 1 261 1490 12 2 1829 11.518 0 0 0
A friend started an on-line discussion about why it was so hard to have a “high-level” discussion about self-defense and martial arts.It isn’t. Part of the problem is that he was trying to do it on the internet, and we all know what kind of person writes stuff on the internet (you have to imagine me looking around at this page for the humor to sink in).In order to have a good conversation, you just need good people. In order to have an intelligent conversation, you need intelligent people. See a pattern here?One of the big problems for potential students of self-defense and martial arts is that almost all are naïve consumers. A naïve consumer is one who can’t tell a good product from a bad product. Most people, when it comes to anything related to violence, can’t distinguish knowledge from horseshit. They simply don’t have a frame of reference.And here’s where it gets interesting, in martial arts: The naivety often doesn’t change. When you get someone truly naïve, they have no truth to compare with what they learn and so whatever they learn becomes, to them, the truth. And they can continue to learn and advance in rank and pass on knowledge and come to believe that they are very high-level practitioners with deep understanding… and their most basic facts are wrong. They have a deep understanding of myths and many are willing to share it (or sell it).In other endeavors, where success or failure are visible and undeniable, it is hard to stay this naive. In other places stupidity hurts. Not so in many martial arts (and one of the many places where sports arts have the edge).And to other naïve people, they sound good. Impressive. To people who have experience, they sound like first graders trying to explain where babies come from. So that’s the first hurdle. I know my criteria for people I trust. Possibly more importantly I have enough experience to pick out the kuchi-waza practitioners fairly quickly. Without that experience can most people even identify a high-order discussion?
A friend started an on-line discussion about why it was so hard to have a “high-level” discussion about self-defense and martial arts.It isn’t. Part of the problem is that he was trying to do it on the internet, and we all know what kind of person writes stuff on the internet (you have to imagine me looking around at this page for the humor to sink in).In order to have a good conversation, you just need good people. In order to have an intelligent conversation, you need intelligent people. See a pattern here?One of the big problems for potential students of self-defense and martial arts is that almost all are naïve consumers. A naïve consumer is one who can’t tell a good product from a bad product. Most people, when it comes to anything related to violence, can’t distinguish knowledge from horseshit. They simply don’t have a frame of reference.And here’s where it gets interesting, in martial arts: The naivety often doesn’t change. When you get someone truly naïve, they have no truth to compare with what they learn and so whatever they learn becomes, to them, the truth. And they can continue to learn and advance in rank and pass on knowledge and come to believe that they are very high-level practitioners with deep understanding… and their most basic facts are wrong. They have a deep understanding of myths and many are willing to share it (or sell it).In other endeavors, where success or failure are visible and undeniable, it is hard to stay this naive. In other places stupidity hurts. Not so in many martial arts (and one of the many places where sports arts have the edge).And to other naïve people, they sound good. Impressive. To people who have experience, they sound like first graders trying to explain where babies come from. So that’s the first hurdle. I know my criteria for people I trust. Possibly more importantly I have enough experience to pick out the kuchi-waza practitioners fairly quickly. Without that experience can most people even identify a high-order discussion?
Looking Ahead
Oakland has been a kick-- fun and rewarding. Two more days before I can do a full After-Action Report. Got to spend some time with Toby and make nefarious plans. Got to really appreciate how Maija moves with a blade. Got to play and think with some extraordinary people. Blood, sweat and tears make a perfect training day, and none of it could have happened without Peter.
Looking ahead. I still have Missouri, Bremerton WA, and Germany coming up. Then surgery. The doc says a long recovery. He says eight weeks immobile and eighteen months off the mat. That's unlikely. I'll definitely have to change some process and for a short while really hold back on some things that I love... but change is growth.
So one of the plans. Physical therapy works for some things, and some things trained early enough and hard enough are far less perishable skills than we think. But my body will be a little different after this, atrophy and the like, and building of muscles is not the same as the building of trust in the muscles. Flow and timing will have to be established, reinforced and integrated.
So it makes sense to start a regular class in late 2013 or 2014. Short term. Worked around my travel schedule. Focused on (safely) playing at high speed, all ranges and natural rules. (Natural rules are things like "we don't want to hurt each other" or "you develop bad habits if you go fast in a slow drill." Artificial rules are things like a specific winning condition or pretending that X always stops things.)
And mostly about me and building up my timing, speed, endurance and flow. Students and fellow explorers would be along for the ride. Somewhere IN SW Washington.
Looking ahead. I still have Missouri, Bremerton WA, and Germany coming up. Then surgery. The doc says a long recovery. He says eight weeks immobile and eighteen months off the mat. That's unlikely. I'll definitely have to change some process and for a short while really hold back on some things that I love... but change is growth.
So one of the plans. Physical therapy works for some things, and some things trained early enough and hard enough are far less perishable skills than we think. But my body will be a little different after this, atrophy and the like, and building of muscles is not the same as the building of trust in the muscles. Flow and timing will have to be established, reinforced and integrated.
So it makes sense to start a regular class in late 2013 or 2014. Short term. Worked around my travel schedule. Focused on (safely) playing at high speed, all ranges and natural rules. (Natural rules are things like "we don't want to hurt each other" or "you develop bad habits if you go fast in a slow drill." Artificial rules are things like a specific winning condition or pretending that X always stops things.)
And mostly about me and building up my timing, speed, endurance and flow. Students and fellow explorers would be along for the ride. Somewhere IN SW Washington.
ROUND TRIP PART 31--GREEN ACRES
GREEN ACRESROUND TRIP PART 31
Green Acres is the place for me.
Outdoor training is the life for me.
Land spreading out so far and wide.
Keep your fancy gym, just give me that countryside.
So last night my son Shane and I did an outdoors workout at the park. Sure, it was hot and muggy. Of course there were copious squadrons of bugs. Good source of protein, we joked, each time they flew into our mouths. And the ground was uneven. And we got mud all over our shoes.
Out here you get to see trees and grass, and you get to try to avoid a land-mine-like field of dog pooh. (Come to think of it maybe that wasn't mud on our shoes after all).
There's just something majestic about an outdoor workout. My hay fever was acting up because EVERYTHING is in bloom, so I sneezed like 8 times in a row, my nose ran like a faucet, and my eyes were redder than the people at a Phish concert. But, yeah, majestic.
We amp'd up our workout, adding more reps with the kettlebells and the dumbbells. We have a long, heavy piece of iron pipe that we use to perform samurai-type sword swings.
After about 20 minutes of that we did a lot of FMA...mostly siniwali double stick work with some applications. Stationary, then forwards, then backwards, then circling left and right.
Then some cool, fast knife work. Some super quick reaction 'sewing machine' type stab drills, followed by some combat scenarios of knife/counter knife, then unarmed against the knife.
As tough as these were the drills at least gave us a chance to catch our breath, which was needed because then it was on to the dreaded hill sprints.
We lengthened the distance of the runs considerably, and added a dog-leg path, jogging for about 30 yards on a relatively flat trail, then cutting quickly to the left for a steep 30 yard all out sprint.
On the last rep we added a pair of dumbbells. Soon we'll add even more weight, and maybe even bring Tito (my grappling/ground 'n pound dummy) to the park for an outing...maybe see if we can take turns carrying him up the hill!!
It was a tough workout, but just beautiful outside. Springtime in Kentucky is amazing!
But the heat was intense, and I'm afraid the summer's gonna be brutal. If Mr Haney shows up with some lemonade, you bet your ass I'll pay him top dollar for a cold glass.
Green Acres is the place for me.
Outdoor training is the life for me.
Land spreading out so far and wide.
Keep your fancy gym, just give me that countryside.
So last night my son Shane and I did an outdoors workout at the park. Sure, it was hot and muggy. Of course there were copious squadrons of bugs. Good source of protein, we joked, each time they flew into our mouths. And the ground was uneven. And we got mud all over our shoes.
Out here you get to see trees and grass, and you get to try to avoid a land-mine-like field of dog pooh. (Come to think of it maybe that wasn't mud on our shoes after all).
There's just something majestic about an outdoor workout. My hay fever was acting up because EVERYTHING is in bloom, so I sneezed like 8 times in a row, my nose ran like a faucet, and my eyes were redder than the people at a Phish concert. But, yeah, majestic.
We amp'd up our workout, adding more reps with the kettlebells and the dumbbells. We have a long, heavy piece of iron pipe that we use to perform samurai-type sword swings.
After about 20 minutes of that we did a lot of FMA...mostly siniwali double stick work with some applications. Stationary, then forwards, then backwards, then circling left and right.
Then some cool, fast knife work. Some super quick reaction 'sewing machine' type stab drills, followed by some combat scenarios of knife/counter knife, then unarmed against the knife.
As tough as these were the drills at least gave us a chance to catch our breath, which was needed because then it was on to the dreaded hill sprints.
We lengthened the distance of the runs considerably, and added a dog-leg path, jogging for about 30 yards on a relatively flat trail, then cutting quickly to the left for a steep 30 yard all out sprint.
On the last rep we added a pair of dumbbells. Soon we'll add even more weight, and maybe even bring Tito (my grappling/ground 'n pound dummy) to the park for an outing...maybe see if we can take turns carrying him up the hill!!
It was a tough workout, but just beautiful outside. Springtime in Kentucky is amazing!
But the heat was intense, and I'm afraid the summer's gonna be brutal. If Mr Haney shows up with some lemonade, you bet your ass I'll pay him top dollar for a cold glass.
GETTING MY CAR AN ATTUNEMENT--A PARABLE
GETTING MY CAR AN ATTUNEMENTA PARABLE
We all need the human touch.Rick Springfield
I think my car needs a tune up.
It's idling kinda funny, hesitates a bit when I accelerate, can be a little sluggish out on the road sometimes, and my gas mileage is not that good.
My old mechanic, Dave, retired last year and closed up his shop so I gotta find someone else.
Looking on line I found somebody that apparently does amazing work. He gets rave reviews, and people say that they drive away from his garage with their cars performing better than ever.
I decide to try him out, so I set up an appointment.
Dave's garage always reeked of gas, oil, cigarette smoke, and hydraulic fluid. The floor was grimy with bits of what looked like kitty litter spread around everywhere. The calendars always featured scantily clad women holding big shiny wrenches. The pneumatic tools gave off high-pitched noises, and there was always somebody making off-color jokes, banging on metal, and coughing, lots of coughing.
This garage is nice though. Subdued lighting, some candles giving off a nice aroma in the corner, gentle New Age music playing in the background. Lots of certificates on the wall, none of them seem to be about car repair.
He's not like other mechanics I've known. First off his hands look delicate, not used to hard work. No dirt under the fingernails. He wears a clean, white, billowy shirt and doesn't have one of those grease rags hanging out of any of his pockets. He does not wear a name tag or have his name embroidered on his shirt. He tells me his name is Timothy (not Tim for short, he corrected me).
He invites me to sit down on some pillows on the floor. He sits cross-legged, perfect posture. Me? My knees won't take that kind of strain so I just sort of awkwardly recline.
We're going to start off with a brief conversation, which seems kind of odd. My old mechanic, Dave, used to just have me start the engine and throttle it a few times. He'd check out some fluids, use some instruments, and run some diagnostics. He did the work while I sat in the waiting room watching Judge Judy and drinking what was either the strongest coffee I've ever tasted or some new type of experimental transmission fluid.
But Timothy? He offers me some chamomile tea and wants to know what I hope to get out of the session.
Timothy says he wants us to build rapport.
Session? Rapport?
So he asks about my driving habits. Where I like to drive. How I handle curves, how quickly I go when the light turns green, what top speed do I travel. Do I often go on lovely country roads, or do I pretty much stick to busy, ugly interstates.
He doesn't take notes. He just nods now and then, speaks in a quiet, somber voice. He explains that he's going to perform an energy scan to pick up energy disturbances in my car's energy field. That's where most of the problems begin, he says, and this is necessary so he'll know where to direct his own energy.
I ask him if I can ask some questions. He agrees, but lets me know his time is limited, and their are other patients to see. Okay, I ask, have you actually studied automobile mechanics? Ever torn an engine down, rebuilt it? Ever changed a timing belt or installed a new trannie?
He smiled. You know, he says, lots of people come home at night and put their dinner in the microwave and turn on their TV's with no knowledge at all of how those things work. The universe, he says, is full of wonder and mystery, but, he says, everything is connected. And the glue that connects us all? Energy...the vibration of atoms. Einstein, he says, pretty much proved all of that a long time ago.
So, now that that's settled, shall we get started, he asks.
Sure, I say. Want me to start 'er up? Rev the engine?
He looks at me funny.
No, he says, no need for all that.
He doesn't even need me to raise the hood. He just needs the payment, so I give him my credit card.
He prints me out a receipt, and he starts at the front bumper. His eyes are closed. His hands hover about 3 or 4 inches above the surface of the car. I start to ask what he's doing, but he opens his eyes and does one of those shushing hand gestures, vertical finger in front of his lips.
He moves around the entire car, doing both sides, and ending up at the muffler. Everything was done on a purely energetic level, with no actual physical contact between his hands and the car.
He's done in about 20 minutes.
What happened? I ask.
He's not exactly sure, he says. His goal was to help the car feel that it was wrapped in a warm, nurturing light and that this loving light was flowing throughout the car's various mechanical systems. He is hoping that the car feels more balanced, calm and centered.
But you fixed it, right? Gave it a tune-up, right? I ask.
Please keep in mind, he says, that there are no guarantees. However, he senses that the car was open to his energy therapy, and he sincerely believes that the car's problems have been healed.
I'm a little confused...What if I still have problems?
He assures me that I can come back again for another session. The energy pathways may require persistent treatment.
I start the car and back out of the garage. Timothy waves goodbye and closes the garage door.
I drive away, listening to the engine, hyper alert to how it sounds, how it rides.
You know how sometimes a car just seems to ride better after you wash it? Well, it's kinda doing that now. Oh sure, there was a slight hesitation at that 4-way stop sign, but I'm convinced that's just a minor hiccup.
Now I'm heading out to the interstate so I can open 'er up and see what this baby can do!
We all need the human touch.Rick Springfield
I think my car needs a tune up.
It's idling kinda funny, hesitates a bit when I accelerate, can be a little sluggish out on the road sometimes, and my gas mileage is not that good.
My old mechanic, Dave, retired last year and closed up his shop so I gotta find someone else.
Looking on line I found somebody that apparently does amazing work. He gets rave reviews, and people say that they drive away from his garage with their cars performing better than ever.
I decide to try him out, so I set up an appointment.
Dave's garage always reeked of gas, oil, cigarette smoke, and hydraulic fluid. The floor was grimy with bits of what looked like kitty litter spread around everywhere. The calendars always featured scantily clad women holding big shiny wrenches. The pneumatic tools gave off high-pitched noises, and there was always somebody making off-color jokes, banging on metal, and coughing, lots of coughing.
This garage is nice though. Subdued lighting, some candles giving off a nice aroma in the corner, gentle New Age music playing in the background. Lots of certificates on the wall, none of them seem to be about car repair.
He's not like other mechanics I've known. First off his hands look delicate, not used to hard work. No dirt under the fingernails. He wears a clean, white, billowy shirt and doesn't have one of those grease rags hanging out of any of his pockets. He does not wear a name tag or have his name embroidered on his shirt. He tells me his name is Timothy (not Tim for short, he corrected me).
He invites me to sit down on some pillows on the floor. He sits cross-legged, perfect posture. Me? My knees won't take that kind of strain so I just sort of awkwardly recline.
We're going to start off with a brief conversation, which seems kind of odd. My old mechanic, Dave, used to just have me start the engine and throttle it a few times. He'd check out some fluids, use some instruments, and run some diagnostics. He did the work while I sat in the waiting room watching Judge Judy and drinking what was either the strongest coffee I've ever tasted or some new type of experimental transmission fluid.
But Timothy? He offers me some chamomile tea and wants to know what I hope to get out of the session.
Timothy says he wants us to build rapport.
Session? Rapport?
So he asks about my driving habits. Where I like to drive. How I handle curves, how quickly I go when the light turns green, what top speed do I travel. Do I often go on lovely country roads, or do I pretty much stick to busy, ugly interstates.
He doesn't take notes. He just nods now and then, speaks in a quiet, somber voice. He explains that he's going to perform an energy scan to pick up energy disturbances in my car's energy field. That's where most of the problems begin, he says, and this is necessary so he'll know where to direct his own energy.
I ask him if I can ask some questions. He agrees, but lets me know his time is limited, and their are other patients to see. Okay, I ask, have you actually studied automobile mechanics? Ever torn an engine down, rebuilt it? Ever changed a timing belt or installed a new trannie?
He smiled. You know, he says, lots of people come home at night and put their dinner in the microwave and turn on their TV's with no knowledge at all of how those things work. The universe, he says, is full of wonder and mystery, but, he says, everything is connected. And the glue that connects us all? Energy...the vibration of atoms. Einstein, he says, pretty much proved all of that a long time ago.
So, now that that's settled, shall we get started, he asks.
Sure, I say. Want me to start 'er up? Rev the engine?
He looks at me funny.
No, he says, no need for all that.
He doesn't even need me to raise the hood. He just needs the payment, so I give him my credit card.
He prints me out a receipt, and he starts at the front bumper. His eyes are closed. His hands hover about 3 or 4 inches above the surface of the car. I start to ask what he's doing, but he opens his eyes and does one of those shushing hand gestures, vertical finger in front of his lips.
He moves around the entire car, doing both sides, and ending up at the muffler. Everything was done on a purely energetic level, with no actual physical contact between his hands and the car.
He's done in about 20 minutes.
What happened? I ask.
He's not exactly sure, he says. His goal was to help the car feel that it was wrapped in a warm, nurturing light and that this loving light was flowing throughout the car's various mechanical systems. He is hoping that the car feels more balanced, calm and centered.
But you fixed it, right? Gave it a tune-up, right? I ask.
Please keep in mind, he says, that there are no guarantees. However, he senses that the car was open to his energy therapy, and he sincerely believes that the car's problems have been healed.
I'm a little confused...What if I still have problems?
He assures me that I can come back again for another session. The energy pathways may require persistent treatment.
I start the car and back out of the garage. Timothy waves goodbye and closes the garage door.
I drive away, listening to the engine, hyper alert to how it sounds, how it rides.
You know how sometimes a car just seems to ride better after you wash it? Well, it's kinda doing that now. Oh sure, there was a slight hesitation at that 4-way stop sign, but I'm convinced that's just a minor hiccup.
Now I'm heading out to the interstate so I can open 'er up and see what this baby can do!
Process and Pathology
Fevers can come from a lot of different things. I was taught that sometimes it is simply the way your body kills viruses, or at least keeps them from reproducing. The fever is part of the process of healing. The virus is the problem, not the fever. The fever is not just a symptom, it is also part of the healing process. When we lower the fever, we ease the visible signs of the sickness, but we also may be prolonging the illness. Protecting the virus.
Stress after a big event is normal. For most people, a huge violent event completely restructures their reality map. It can show you that everything you believe and value is context-dependent. Or I can be harsh and more honest and say that you will come to know that almost all of your cherished beliefs about what people are were simply lies. Pretty lies and pleasant lies and things that most of the population works very hard to make true... but lies none the less.
But because most people are good people and work hard to make some of the harsh truths less true. Might does, in fact, make right-- unless strong, good people stand up and through action and force of will make it untrue. Violence works, and has for millennia and across all species-- until we came up with the will and the vision that we can make it not work. And that requires a capacity for violence as well. The only defense against evil violent men are good men with more skill at violence.
That's a digression. The point is that there will be a period of adjustment after a violent event. Some will always be damaged. Most of those I know are the ones trying to return to 'normal'. The normal that a deep part of them now knows never really existed. They feel that the only thing that can make them right is to go back to a state that they now know was always false. Just like someone crushed with responsibilities wishing to be a child again.
Some will find a new normal, and that normal will largely depend on how much of what they were exposed to. With a single aberrant event, they can rewrite a reality map pretty much like the old one. Pretend the event was an abnormality. With lots of exposure in different areas, the violence becomes the new normal and, at least for me, you feel a little awe over the power of will and human vision and technology that has made the natural so rare. Peace occurs in nature about as often as suspension bridges.
A lot of the adjustment and 'healing' is a recalibration process. One of the symptoms of PTSD is hypervigilance. You know what? There's some shit you don't survive without a hefty dose of hypervigilance. It's not just a super-power, it's a necessary survival trait. Does that make it pathological? Are the people treating this symptom aware that they, the counselors and doctors, might have died in that environment without that 'symptom'? Are they trying to help people be better, or help them return to normal? In extreme environments, 'normal' is rarely better.
But it can get uncomfortable, and can be dangerous. Just like going from dim light to bright light or vise versa, there will be, must be, an adjustment time. That's normal.
And waking up from a nightmare. That's part of the healing process. Dreams are one way you work through things. And part of the recalibration process is to snap awake in a cold sweat...and have someone you love hold you and say, "It's okay. It's okay. It's just a dream. You're home now."
Don't confuse the healing process with the pathology. And it is a process. And it is growth, not repair. You will be different afterwards. Stronger, if you manage the process well.
Stress after a big event is normal. For most people, a huge violent event completely restructures their reality map. It can show you that everything you believe and value is context-dependent. Or I can be harsh and more honest and say that you will come to know that almost all of your cherished beliefs about what people are were simply lies. Pretty lies and pleasant lies and things that most of the population works very hard to make true... but lies none the less.
But because most people are good people and work hard to make some of the harsh truths less true. Might does, in fact, make right-- unless strong, good people stand up and through action and force of will make it untrue. Violence works, and has for millennia and across all species-- until we came up with the will and the vision that we can make it not work. And that requires a capacity for violence as well. The only defense against evil violent men are good men with more skill at violence.
That's a digression. The point is that there will be a period of adjustment after a violent event. Some will always be damaged. Most of those I know are the ones trying to return to 'normal'. The normal that a deep part of them now knows never really existed. They feel that the only thing that can make them right is to go back to a state that they now know was always false. Just like someone crushed with responsibilities wishing to be a child again.
Some will find a new normal, and that normal will largely depend on how much of what they were exposed to. With a single aberrant event, they can rewrite a reality map pretty much like the old one. Pretend the event was an abnormality. With lots of exposure in different areas, the violence becomes the new normal and, at least for me, you feel a little awe over the power of will and human vision and technology that has made the natural so rare. Peace occurs in nature about as often as suspension bridges.
A lot of the adjustment and 'healing' is a recalibration process. One of the symptoms of PTSD is hypervigilance. You know what? There's some shit you don't survive without a hefty dose of hypervigilance. It's not just a super-power, it's a necessary survival trait. Does that make it pathological? Are the people treating this symptom aware that they, the counselors and doctors, might have died in that environment without that 'symptom'? Are they trying to help people be better, or help them return to normal? In extreme environments, 'normal' is rarely better.
But it can get uncomfortable, and can be dangerous. Just like going from dim light to bright light or vise versa, there will be, must be, an adjustment time. That's normal.
And waking up from a nightmare. That's part of the healing process. Dreams are one way you work through things. And part of the recalibration process is to snap awake in a cold sweat...and have someone you love hold you and say, "It's okay. It's okay. It's just a dream. You're home now."
Don't confuse the healing process with the pathology. And it is a process. And it is growth, not repair. You will be different afterwards. Stronger, if you manage the process well.
DePauw
That was interesting.
A new time frame-- 2x6.5 hours, with actual lunch breaks.
The youngest group I'd ever played with. Not just age. In most of the other classes I believe average martial experience has been over 15 years. So this group was young in a couple of ways. And it completely didn't matter.
One of the original issues with training cops is that there is a wide variety of skills and experience. You will get rookies who haven't even been to the academy yet, veteran meat-eaters who really know their way around a brawl and men and women right on the edge of retirement. You'll get gym rat tac guys and desk jockey investigators; people in great shape just out of military service and and guys who have spent most of the last ten or twenty years driving a car and eating junk food. And outside of work, some of them have been doing martial arts as a hobby since long before they were cops, some are competitive martial athletes and some have never taken a physical class of any kind since the academy.
You have to give them all something. And the skills have to work, despite size or strength disparity, because cops don't get to pick their bad guys and the stakes are high. If you teach shit you will wind up visiting hospitals or attending funerals.
It has to be easy enough for beginners to grasp; have insights that experienced martial artists can play with; physical enough for the meat-eaters but safe enough for administrations; challenging for everyone. So it's not a simple scale. An 'easy' class helps the beginners but bores the skilled. An 'advanced' class confuses the beginners. But that assumes 'easy' and 'advanced' are somewhere on a linear continuum and that assumption is a mistake.
So it was a good test and extra validation for the awareness-based-training model. Thanks, Mac. The student who said she had no training was redirecting heads into walls like everyone else by the end of the weekend. The instructor levels were working out how to adapt and analyze the information and drills.
Some of the lessons learned:
--Doing ConCom first really allows me to speed up part of the lecture, but only if everyone has attended ConCom. The Conflict Dynamics section of ConCom is similar but not the same as the Violence Dynamics section of Ambushes and Thugs.
--There are things I like teaching that are only important to certain audiences.
--I can cut three hours out of the program and not feel like I am withholding critical, life-saving information. Much. Still insecure about leaving anything out.
--The biggest issue that was left out are the little talks about how to coach some of the drills. Never realized how important that could be.
--I talk way too much and tell too many stories when I'm sleep deprived. I think these guys got more of the funny and icky stories than any other group. (Don't worry, I didn't waste much class time. It was mostly afterwards at dinner.)
So thanks to Brandon Sieg, an excellent host, and also a sincere martial artist who really wants the best for his students. He takes the responsibility very seriously, thinks and plans. He's created a FAST team that is both effective and creative, and a collection of good students (look at the students to see the instructor).
Good times.
A new time frame-- 2x6.5 hours, with actual lunch breaks.
The youngest group I'd ever played with. Not just age. In most of the other classes I believe average martial experience has been over 15 years. So this group was young in a couple of ways. And it completely didn't matter.
One of the original issues with training cops is that there is a wide variety of skills and experience. You will get rookies who haven't even been to the academy yet, veteran meat-eaters who really know their way around a brawl and men and women right on the edge of retirement. You'll get gym rat tac guys and desk jockey investigators; people in great shape just out of military service and and guys who have spent most of the last ten or twenty years driving a car and eating junk food. And outside of work, some of them have been doing martial arts as a hobby since long before they were cops, some are competitive martial athletes and some have never taken a physical class of any kind since the academy.
You have to give them all something. And the skills have to work, despite size or strength disparity, because cops don't get to pick their bad guys and the stakes are high. If you teach shit you will wind up visiting hospitals or attending funerals.
It has to be easy enough for beginners to grasp; have insights that experienced martial artists can play with; physical enough for the meat-eaters but safe enough for administrations; challenging for everyone. So it's not a simple scale. An 'easy' class helps the beginners but bores the skilled. An 'advanced' class confuses the beginners. But that assumes 'easy' and 'advanced' are somewhere on a linear continuum and that assumption is a mistake.
So it was a good test and extra validation for the awareness-based-training model. Thanks, Mac. The student who said she had no training was redirecting heads into walls like everyone else by the end of the weekend. The instructor levels were working out how to adapt and analyze the information and drills.
Some of the lessons learned:
--Doing ConCom first really allows me to speed up part of the lecture, but only if everyone has attended ConCom. The Conflict Dynamics section of ConCom is similar but not the same as the Violence Dynamics section of Ambushes and Thugs.
--There are things I like teaching that are only important to certain audiences.
--I can cut three hours out of the program and not feel like I am withholding critical, life-saving information. Much. Still insecure about leaving anything out.
--The biggest issue that was left out are the little talks about how to coach some of the drills. Never realized how important that could be.
--I talk way too much and tell too many stories when I'm sleep deprived. I think these guys got more of the funny and icky stories than any other group. (Don't worry, I didn't waste much class time. It was mostly afterwards at dinner.)
So thanks to Brandon Sieg, an excellent host, and also a sincere martial artist who really wants the best for his students. He takes the responsibility very seriously, thinks and plans. He's created a FAST team that is both effective and creative, and a collection of good students (look at the students to see the instructor).
Good times.
EVER-VIGILANT: RUN LIKE HELL
RUN LIKE HELLEVER-VIGILANT
"Well, they call me the Hunter, that's my name, Call me the Hunter, that's how I got my fame."
Led Zeppelin
"Humans today may retain behaviors tied to our ancestors' likely past status as prey rather than predator."
Jennifer Viegas
"You'd better run!"
Pink Floyd, "Run Like Hell"
In a recent HBO comedy special, Louis CK discussed the stress of modern life. Daily living is tough for a lot of us, he says, just dealing with work, family life, and trying to make ends meet. But he imagined that it would be a lot more stressful if we faced the same threat our ancestors faced, the threat of being attacked and eaten by wild animals. Not only would you have to deal with over bearing bosses and backstabbing co-workers all day, but getting off the subway and heading home, you might have to run for your life as hungry cheetahs try to run you down.
Can you imagine having to live with the fear of predation all of the time? You'd have to remain hyper-vigilant, never relaxing completely.
After an enormous amount of reading on the subject I am convinced that it was the fear of being attacked and eaten by wild beasts such as wild dogs, big cats, hyenas, eagles, wolves, cave bears, snakes, crocodiles, (and--get this--maybe even carnivorous kangaroos), that helped to apply specific selective pressures in shaping our species. Although it's not entirely clear which pressures these predators placed on our early ancestors, researcher Kirsten Jenkins says that they affected "behavior, group structure, body size and ontogeny (the life cycle of a single organism)."
We are who we are, says Rob Dunn, "thanks to ancestors who only just barely got away."
Looking at one site containing "de-fleshed, chomped and gnawed bones" from an early primate ancestor of humans, Jenkins said, "I have observed multiple tooth pits and probable beak marks on these fossil primates, which are direct evidence for creodonts and raptors consuming these primates."
According to National Geographic, Agustin Fuentes and other researchers "believe that early humans were a prey species hunted by bear-size hyenas, saber-toothed cats, and many other large carnivores. Early humans survived while other primate species died out because our ancestors cooperated to alter their surroundings, and this cooperation deflected the risk of predation onto other nearby prey species, which became more vulnerable because early humans weren't as easy to catch."
Anthropologist Robert Sussman found that "our ancestors from three or four million years ago, Australopithecus afarensis, had small teeth, lacked tools, and were about three feet (one meter) tall. Lacking size or weapons, this early human species most likely used brains, agility, and social skills to escape from predators, the anthropologist says."
The predation rate, according to Sussman, was about 6 percent.
"Predators remain a powerful force in the lives of many of our fellow creatures," reports Olivia Judson. "It’s not just that they kill. They also change what their potential victims get up to. In short, they create a landscape of fear."
Much of our mental activity seems to have been impacted by these old fears: preoccupation with remembering salient, life-threatening events from close calls with danger in the past, keeping track of the myriad rules for survival that we have been taught, and being attuned to potential threats, and imagining threats in the future.
When taking a look at one aspect of survival, foraging for food for example, predation must be factored in. Where are the predators? When do they like to hunt? How many of them are there? A high-quality foraging area with energy-rich food may also be right out in the open, far from quick escape routes. This means that foraging may have to take place in areas where food is less plentiful or where the quality of the available food is less than ideal.
Behaviors are shaped by such considerations. You can't easily scan the horizon looking for predators while at the same time focusing on the ground for nuts, fallen fruit, bugs and roots. Cooperative foraging in groups, with someone always on the lookout and ready to sound the alarm, may have been an early strategy.
"Foragers," says Regan Berkley, "must make trade-offs between foraging efficiency and security from predation. The modifications they make to their behaviors have consequences that may affect their nutrition or their survival."
Will Cresswell notes that "Predators can affect individual fitness and population and community processes through lethal effects (direct consumption or ‘density’ effects), where prey is consumed, or through non-lethal effects (trait-mediated effects or interactions), where behavioural compensation to predation risk occurs, such as animals avoiding areas of high predation risk."
The lethal effects are obvious...we get eaten. But the non-lethal effects are a key factor as well, with some researchers concluding that, while similar, non-lethal effects were as much as 85% of all effects. Reduction in foraging, slower growth rates, lower reproductive rates, can impact behavior and morphology, determine the overall population and impact group dynamics.
“During any given day, an animal may fail to obtain a meal and go hungry, or it may fail to obtain matings and thus realize no reproductive success, but in the long term, the day’s shortcomings may have minimal influence on lifetime fitness. Few failures, however, are as unforgiving as the failure to avoid a predator: being killed greatly decreases future fitness." Lima and Dill (1990)
I have come to the conclusion in my own reading on this subject that individual behaviors and thought processes in humans were deeply impacted, and modern man still carries within himself these behaviors, abilities and innate responses.
One such ability is imagining. Here's how neuro-scientist V.S. Ramachandran describes it: "The capacity to plan open-ended scenarios and try out even improbable scenarios entirely in the mind by juggling images and symbols (especially when) linked with episodic memories, enables you to see yourself as an active agent doing things in the future..."
"In the developed world, we live in the most peaceful, healthful time in history," says Rob Dunn. "The murder and violent crime rate is dropping; we are vaccinated against the most deadly diseases of previous generations; our houses protect us from most storms; relatively few people go hungry. The average lifespan is longer than it has ever been. Then why do we walk around so anxious, so full of fear? The answer is not terrorists, TV, Republicans, or Democrats. The answer is our legacy of ancient fears, the result of having spent millions of years running from predators. Our fear response is more influenced by the ancient species we struggled to escape than any modern challenges. We live in a demon-haunted world."
"When biologists consider the effects that predators have on their prey, they shouldn’t just count the number of individuals consumed. According to University of Rhode Island ecologist Evan Preisser, they must also examine the effects of fear." So another impact would be what Brown et al. (1999) referred to as the ‘ecology of fear’ "to describe how in mammalian systems, where behaviourally complex predators hunt behaviourally complex prey, populations may be limited by the ‘fear’ of predation..."
The ecology of fear doesn't necessarily mean the species or individual experiences fear all the time. Instead it means that the species has an "evolved tendency to manifest adaptive trait changes when exposed to cues associated
with heightened likelihood of mortality."
biologists consider the effects that predators have on their prey, they shouldn’t just count the number of individuals consumed. According to a University of Rhode Island ecologist, they must also examine the effects of fear.
Read more at: http://phys.org/news138381419.html#jCp "Predation risk is usually a composite of several interacting factors, and so it is often difficult to quantify simply. Predation risk (death rate) for an animal is a function of attack frequency and its probability of being caught when attacked. Attack frequency (attack rate) incorporates the reaction of predators to the behavior of prey, for example, a functional and numerical response. All of the behaviors that a prey can adopt to modify its risk of being targeted and caught when attacked comprise prey vulnerability. The key variable in determining predation risk is probably prey vulnerability because predators that are foraging optimally will select the prey that give the maximum energy return for energy invested in capture, that is those individuals of a prey species that are the easiest to catch." (Stephens and Krebs, 1986).
I contend that this fear of and worry about predation has manifested itself in modern times by certain traits:
"Well, they call me the Hunter, that's my name, Call me the Hunter, that's how I got my fame."
Led Zeppelin
"Humans today may retain behaviors tied to our ancestors' likely past status as prey rather than predator."
Jennifer Viegas
"You'd better run!"
Pink Floyd, "Run Like Hell"
In a recent HBO comedy special, Louis CK discussed the stress of modern life. Daily living is tough for a lot of us, he says, just dealing with work, family life, and trying to make ends meet. But he imagined that it would be a lot more stressful if we faced the same threat our ancestors faced, the threat of being attacked and eaten by wild animals. Not only would you have to deal with over bearing bosses and backstabbing co-workers all day, but getting off the subway and heading home, you might have to run for your life as hungry cheetahs try to run you down.
Can you imagine having to live with the fear of predation all of the time? You'd have to remain hyper-vigilant, never relaxing completely.
After an enormous amount of reading on the subject I am convinced that it was the fear of being attacked and eaten by wild beasts such as wild dogs, big cats, hyenas, eagles, wolves, cave bears, snakes, crocodiles, (and--get this--maybe even carnivorous kangaroos), that helped to apply specific selective pressures in shaping our species. Although it's not entirely clear which pressures these predators placed on our early ancestors, researcher Kirsten Jenkins says that they affected "behavior, group structure, body size and ontogeny (the life cycle of a single organism)."
We are who we are, says Rob Dunn, "thanks to ancestors who only just barely got away."
Looking at one site containing "de-fleshed, chomped and gnawed bones" from an early primate ancestor of humans, Jenkins said, "I have observed multiple tooth pits and probable beak marks on these fossil primates, which are direct evidence for creodonts and raptors consuming these primates."
According to National Geographic, Agustin Fuentes and other researchers "believe that early humans were a prey species hunted by bear-size hyenas, saber-toothed cats, and many other large carnivores. Early humans survived while other primate species died out because our ancestors cooperated to alter their surroundings, and this cooperation deflected the risk of predation onto other nearby prey species, which became more vulnerable because early humans weren't as easy to catch."
Anthropologist Robert Sussman found that "our ancestors from three or four million years ago, Australopithecus afarensis, had small teeth, lacked tools, and were about three feet (one meter) tall. Lacking size or weapons, this early human species most likely used brains, agility, and social skills to escape from predators, the anthropologist says."
The predation rate, according to Sussman, was about 6 percent.
"Predators remain a powerful force in the lives of many of our fellow creatures," reports Olivia Judson. "It’s not just that they kill. They also change what their potential victims get up to. In short, they create a landscape of fear."
Much of our mental activity seems to have been impacted by these old fears: preoccupation with remembering salient, life-threatening events from close calls with danger in the past, keeping track of the myriad rules for survival that we have been taught, and being attuned to potential threats, and imagining threats in the future.
When taking a look at one aspect of survival, foraging for food for example, predation must be factored in. Where are the predators? When do they like to hunt? How many of them are there? A high-quality foraging area with energy-rich food may also be right out in the open, far from quick escape routes. This means that foraging may have to take place in areas where food is less plentiful or where the quality of the available food is less than ideal.
Behaviors are shaped by such considerations. You can't easily scan the horizon looking for predators while at the same time focusing on the ground for nuts, fallen fruit, bugs and roots. Cooperative foraging in groups, with someone always on the lookout and ready to sound the alarm, may have been an early strategy.
"Foragers," says Regan Berkley, "must make trade-offs between foraging efficiency and security from predation. The modifications they make to their behaviors have consequences that may affect their nutrition or their survival."
Will Cresswell notes that "Predators can affect individual fitness and population and community processes through lethal effects (direct consumption or ‘density’ effects), where prey is consumed, or through non-lethal effects (trait-mediated effects or interactions), where behavioural compensation to predation risk occurs, such as animals avoiding areas of high predation risk."
The lethal effects are obvious...we get eaten. But the non-lethal effects are a key factor as well, with some researchers concluding that, while similar, non-lethal effects were as much as 85% of all effects. Reduction in foraging, slower growth rates, lower reproductive rates, can impact behavior and morphology, determine the overall population and impact group dynamics.
“During any given day, an animal may fail to obtain a meal and go hungry, or it may fail to obtain matings and thus realize no reproductive success, but in the long term, the day’s shortcomings may have minimal influence on lifetime fitness. Few failures, however, are as unforgiving as the failure to avoid a predator: being killed greatly decreases future fitness." Lima and Dill (1990)
I have come to the conclusion in my own reading on this subject that individual behaviors and thought processes in humans were deeply impacted, and modern man still carries within himself these behaviors, abilities and innate responses.
One such ability is imagining. Here's how neuro-scientist V.S. Ramachandran describes it: "The capacity to plan open-ended scenarios and try out even improbable scenarios entirely in the mind by juggling images and symbols (especially when) linked with episodic memories, enables you to see yourself as an active agent doing things in the future..."
"In the developed world, we live in the most peaceful, healthful time in history," says Rob Dunn. "The murder and violent crime rate is dropping; we are vaccinated against the most deadly diseases of previous generations; our houses protect us from most storms; relatively few people go hungry. The average lifespan is longer than it has ever been. Then why do we walk around so anxious, so full of fear? The answer is not terrorists, TV, Republicans, or Democrats. The answer is our legacy of ancient fears, the result of having spent millions of years running from predators. Our fear response is more influenced by the ancient species we struggled to escape than any modern challenges. We live in a demon-haunted world."
"When biologists consider the effects that predators have on their prey, they shouldn’t just count the number of individuals consumed. According to University of Rhode Island ecologist Evan Preisser, they must also examine the effects of fear." So another impact would be what Brown et al. (1999) referred to as the ‘ecology of fear’ "to describe how in mammalian systems, where behaviourally complex predators hunt behaviourally complex prey, populations may be limited by the ‘fear’ of predation..."
The ecology of fear doesn't necessarily mean the species or individual experiences fear all the time. Instead it means that the species has an "evolved tendency to manifest adaptive trait changes when exposed to cues associated
with heightened likelihood of mortality."
biologists consider the effects that predators have on their prey, they shouldn’t just count the number of individuals consumed. According to a University of Rhode Island ecologist, they must also examine the effects of fear.
Read more at: http://phys.org/news138381419.html#jCp "Predation risk is usually a composite of several interacting factors, and so it is often difficult to quantify simply. Predation risk (death rate) for an animal is a function of attack frequency and its probability of being caught when attacked. Attack frequency (attack rate) incorporates the reaction of predators to the behavior of prey, for example, a functional and numerical response. All of the behaviors that a prey can adopt to modify its risk of being targeted and caught when attacked comprise prey vulnerability. The key variable in determining predation risk is probably prey vulnerability because predators that are foraging optimally will select the prey that give the maximum energy return for energy invested in capture, that is those individuals of a prey species that are the easiest to catch." (Stephens and Krebs, 1986).
I contend that this fear of and worry about predation has manifested itself in modern times by certain traits:
- Wariness, and enhanced and increased vigilance
- Pattern and movement detection
- Alertness to the signals of predation
- Cognitive complexity
- Jumpiness and misplaced anxiety
- Fear of fear itself
- Creation of fear-based scenarios and a systematized methodology to evoke fear
- Creation of a virtual, malleable self-concept of 'manhood'
ROUND TRIP PART 30--THE HILLS ARE ALIVE
THE HILLS ARE ALIVE
(With the Sounds of Screaming)ROUND TRIP PART 30
You know what they say: It's all fun and games until somebody coughs up a lung.
Hill sprints.
At my age.
I must be crazy.
My son Shane and I set out a little path on a nice hillside in a lovely green meadow at Louisville's Cherokee Park, a park designed in 1891 by Frederick Law Olmstead who also designed New York City's Central Park.
The course for our sprints was only about 50 yards long, but it got pretty steep as we neared the top.
We ran up to the top, and then we jogged back to the bottom. Over and over (and over) again.
It went on for hours!
Well, technically it was only about 10 or 12 minutes or so, but it FELT like hours.
We did this at the end of an already tough workout, which started out with a thorough kettlebell workout, variations on squats and lunges, a dumbbell workout, and a long series of boxing training drills. So we were already a little tired.
I think hill sprints are fantastic for building leg strength, core strength, explosive power and endurance.
I hate them.
But I guess that's why we need to do them.
Starting next week week we add on extra time and/or extra laps. Soon we'll move to the notorious dog hill, a long, steep hill just perfect for wintertime sledding, but hellish for sprinting.
Once that is accomplished, we'll probably add some weighted back packs.
But, a journey of a thousand miles begins with some preliminary cussing.
So, you da@#ed hill, here we come! If you hear blood-curdling screams, don't worry, it's just me, coughing up that lung.
(With the Sounds of Screaming)ROUND TRIP PART 30
You know what they say: It's all fun and games until somebody coughs up a lung.
Hill sprints.
At my age.
I must be crazy.
My son Shane and I set out a little path on a nice hillside in a lovely green meadow at Louisville's Cherokee Park, a park designed in 1891 by Frederick Law Olmstead who also designed New York City's Central Park.
The course for our sprints was only about 50 yards long, but it got pretty steep as we neared the top.
We ran up to the top, and then we jogged back to the bottom. Over and over (and over) again.
It went on for hours!
Well, technically it was only about 10 or 12 minutes or so, but it FELT like hours.
We did this at the end of an already tough workout, which started out with a thorough kettlebell workout, variations on squats and lunges, a dumbbell workout, and a long series of boxing training drills. So we were already a little tired.
I think hill sprints are fantastic for building leg strength, core strength, explosive power and endurance.
I hate them.
But I guess that's why we need to do them.
Starting next week week we add on extra time and/or extra laps. Soon we'll move to the notorious dog hill, a long, steep hill just perfect for wintertime sledding, but hellish for sprinting.
Once that is accomplished, we'll probably add some weighted back packs.
But, a journey of a thousand miles begins with some preliminary cussing.
So, you da@#ed hill, here we come! If you hear blood-curdling screams, don't worry, it's just me, coughing up that lung.
CofV 12.3: Terrain
I'll be winging this. Terrain is, literally, a big topic and I know I can just touch on it in a blog post.
Some things that need to be in there:
Cover
Concealment
Vision, including reflections and shadows
Movement control
Resource access
Escape routes
Unconventional applications
And all under the headings of how to read the terrain, how to use the terrain and how to manipulate the terrain.
There's way more. This is stuff I do but rarely teach. I'm finding a direct correlation between how well I can write or speak about something and how often I teach it.
Reading Terrain--
One of the elements to be aware of is flow of resources, and since we are talking about self-protection, you are the resource. Bad stuff happens in predictable places. A mugger could starve waiting in random dark alleys. But the mouth of the alley between, say, the convention center hotel and the nearest strip club will give you a lot of unaware, out of shape, drunk, non-local, cash carrying businessmen. Think about the victim profiles and where you would hunt for them.
Another element are forced flows. Places where you must pass too close to a blind spot. Places where the threat doesn't even move but his prey comes within arm's reach. There is a reason that women despise nightclubs with long hallways to the restroom.
Blindspots and vision spots. Places you can't see into (blind corners, pockets of shadows) and places you, or the threat, can watch easily from. This list expands as you get better at utilizing reflections and shadows. And that skill is manipulatable as you can position yourself to take advantage of shadows, but you can also adjust a windowed door or place your sunglasses to maximize useful reflections.
Escape routes, choke points and death funnels. How well you must know terrain and how you use it changes by mission. Defensive strategies use funnels of death, offensive strategies need to bypass them quickly, for instance. The 'funnel of death' is any small area that you and your team must bypass that allows the enemy to concentrate fire. Choke points or bottlenecks in other words. Escape routes are cool and the bad guy will likely have planned his. You should look for them by habit. The trouble with hiding strategies that have only one escape route is that by definition, when you are found, the threat will be blocking your escape route.
Cover and concealment. Cover will stop a bullet, concealment will keep someone from seeing you. Hiding behind drywall is concealment, but drywall won't stop most bullets. It's not cover. That said, I'm a little disturbed with the idea with cover as a category. Concrete blocks are not necessarily cover for .308 rifle rounds. I've shot through those. Anyway, think of cover as a guideline. Better than nothing and always use it, but don't count on it. Also, remember, that some things change with angles. A stick-built house offers practically no cover... except if you are shooting down a hallway, the threat's bullets have to engage, because of the angle, sideways drywall and all of the studs.
Everything above you need to be able to see, but you also need to be able to exploit. How do you see around a corner before you negotiate it? How do you angle to get maximum visibility at safest distance. How do you cramp an assailant's movements? How do you use the environment instead of simply mitigating the effects? (That's what I love about day two of the A&T seminar). How do you position yourself to maximize your useful information and minimize the threat's?
And what is there in the terrain that you can change? Already mentioned adjusting doors and placing sunglasses to maximize vision. There's more. One of our old deputies always sat in a way that let him flip the chair out from between his legs in a flash. My cell extraction method got a lot of juice from the fact that there was a concrete bench at knee height and I knew precisely where it was. Sophisticated inmates who expected the team would soap their floors...and we countered that with kitty litter.
There's a psychological element to terrain as well. A surprising number of people, even in emergencies, will respect a "Do Not Enter" or "Employees Only" sign. Not bad guys, of course. If they followed rules they wouldn't be bad guys.
Enough for now. Big subject and I need to organize thoughts a little more.
Some things that need to be in there:
Cover
Concealment
Vision, including reflections and shadows
Movement control
Resource access
Escape routes
Unconventional applications
And all under the headings of how to read the terrain, how to use the terrain and how to manipulate the terrain.
There's way more. This is stuff I do but rarely teach. I'm finding a direct correlation between how well I can write or speak about something and how often I teach it.
Reading Terrain--
One of the elements to be aware of is flow of resources, and since we are talking about self-protection, you are the resource. Bad stuff happens in predictable places. A mugger could starve waiting in random dark alleys. But the mouth of the alley between, say, the convention center hotel and the nearest strip club will give you a lot of unaware, out of shape, drunk, non-local, cash carrying businessmen. Think about the victim profiles and where you would hunt for them.
Another element are forced flows. Places where you must pass too close to a blind spot. Places where the threat doesn't even move but his prey comes within arm's reach. There is a reason that women despise nightclubs with long hallways to the restroom.
Blindspots and vision spots. Places you can't see into (blind corners, pockets of shadows) and places you, or the threat, can watch easily from. This list expands as you get better at utilizing reflections and shadows. And that skill is manipulatable as you can position yourself to take advantage of shadows, but you can also adjust a windowed door or place your sunglasses to maximize useful reflections.
Escape routes, choke points and death funnels. How well you must know terrain and how you use it changes by mission. Defensive strategies use funnels of death, offensive strategies need to bypass them quickly, for instance. The 'funnel of death' is any small area that you and your team must bypass that allows the enemy to concentrate fire. Choke points or bottlenecks in other words. Escape routes are cool and the bad guy will likely have planned his. You should look for them by habit. The trouble with hiding strategies that have only one escape route is that by definition, when you are found, the threat will be blocking your escape route.
Cover and concealment. Cover will stop a bullet, concealment will keep someone from seeing you. Hiding behind drywall is concealment, but drywall won't stop most bullets. It's not cover. That said, I'm a little disturbed with the idea with cover as a category. Concrete blocks are not necessarily cover for .308 rifle rounds. I've shot through those. Anyway, think of cover as a guideline. Better than nothing and always use it, but don't count on it. Also, remember, that some things change with angles. A stick-built house offers practically no cover... except if you are shooting down a hallway, the threat's bullets have to engage, because of the angle, sideways drywall and all of the studs.
Everything above you need to be able to see, but you also need to be able to exploit. How do you see around a corner before you negotiate it? How do you angle to get maximum visibility at safest distance. How do you cramp an assailant's movements? How do you use the environment instead of simply mitigating the effects? (That's what I love about day two of the A&T seminar). How do you position yourself to maximize your useful information and minimize the threat's?
And what is there in the terrain that you can change? Already mentioned adjusting doors and placing sunglasses to maximize vision. There's more. One of our old deputies always sat in a way that let him flip the chair out from between his legs in a flash. My cell extraction method got a lot of juice from the fact that there was a concrete bench at knee height and I knew precisely where it was. Sophisticated inmates who expected the team would soap their floors...and we countered that with kitty litter.
There's a psychological element to terrain as well. A surprising number of people, even in emergencies, will respect a "Do Not Enter" or "Employees Only" sign. Not bad guys, of course. If they followed rules they wouldn't be bad guys.
Enough for now. Big subject and I need to organize thoughts a little more.
CofV 12.2: You
Classifications of Violence 12 is about threat assessment. 12.1 was about adrenaline signs. Very few people can force themselves to go hands-on cold, so adrenaline is one of the reliable signs that things are about to go south. And certain adrenaline responses indicate skill or experience with adrenaline. Stuff you should know.
12.3 will be about distinguishing between social and asocial violence. Threat displays versus pre-assault indicators. Maybe. I might go into reading terrain instead.
The other element in this equation is YOU. Violence is used for specific purposes. As such, it has its own logic. Incidents of violence are chaotic because you have multiple people in an adrenalized state that is unfamiliar to at least one of them. It's not that violence doesn't have rules, it's that you likely don't know them.
Remember, here, that I am not saying 'rules' in a game context, i.e. artificial constructs designed to control a person's behavior. I mean rules in the sense that there is a cause-and-effect relationship. These are rules for prediction, not rules of behavior.
Violence is used for specific purposes. Each incident has specific goals. Dollars to feed a bad drug habit in resource predation versus gaining or clarifying status in a Monkey Dance for example. It also has specific parameters. With a few exceptions, the druggie wants to avoid withdrawals, so he doesn't want to get caught (usually-- see Fleisher's "Beggars and Thieves" for the interesting detail that most hustlers choose to go to jail for specific reasons). He can't afford to be injured, because then others will prey on him. In a MD, the primary parameter is to avoid humiliation at all cost.
Another factor mandating predictability is that violence is a high-risk strategy. When you are doing something that is dangerous, and you have a strategy that works, it is really hard and really dangerous to try something new and untested. MOs are reliable for a reason.
So now it's about you. The goals and parameters paradigm create a subconscious risk-reward math for the bad guy. What rewards for what kind of crimes do you offer and what is the risk you present?
MD
Are you a young man? Who hangs out with other young men? While drinking? Do you go places where said young men hang out? Then there is some potential for MD. If you are a little older, your Monkey Dances are likely executed with words and office politics.
GMD
Remember there are three categories.
The bonding type is rare but can possibly target anybody. Your risk increases if you spend time where territories are in dispute (whether the edge of gang territory, war zones or sports bars) and/or you are easily identified as an outsider.
Boundary Setting should only come up if you regularly intervene in stranger's problems. LEOs, Social Workers...
Betrayal. Partner, unless you are a member of a violent group AND they have reason to believe you have betrayed them, you don't have to worry about this one.
EBD
This one will only come up if you violate the rules of a group and will only go violent if you violate either a major rule (e.g. betrayal) or break the rules of a violent group. And how violent will depend on the group. So, as long as you stay in your group, you know how to behave and what to expect. Educational Beat Down shouldn't be a problem. If, however you travel to or liaise with groups you don't know well, there is some risk. Risk goes up exponentially with your arrogance.
SSS
Because it is intended to break the rules of social violence, everyone is slightly vulnerable. That said, this is a pattern pretty much exclusive to violent criminal subcultures. If you don't spend time around such people, your risk is minimal.
Resource Predator
If you look like you have money (some money, not much-- homeless people rob each other all the time) and you don't look like you'd be a problem (easy to intimidate either psychologically or physically) you're a target for muggers. There are lots of behaviors that can raise your risk-- not paying attention, getting drunk, being alone in a high-risk locations. That's all standard self-defense advice.
Process Predator
In some ways, this is the hardest to narrow down the victim profiles. The process predator is idiosyncratic. For example, someone who gets addicted to the status seeking show (SSS) may prefer to assault, humiliate and kill or cripple big, strong, men. He has learned over time that sudden ferocity trumps skill or physicality and it is simply worth more reputation, and feels more satisfying, to beat a big man. Another may choose his victims for his own safety. An opportunistic rapist may target any vulnerable or small woman who piques his interest...and another rapist may only target women who subconsciously remind him of his mother. Generally, though, people who don't look like they will put up a fight are the safest bet for the predator; and most want an inner weakness or emotional lability. They want to see a victim cry, scream and beg.
Most in-shape martial athletes are, at most, on the target list for a Monkey Dance. The safest and most avoidable. If you teach self-defense you have to look at each of your student's with predator's eyes (all the different types of bad guys) to determine what they are likely to face.
12.3 will be about distinguishing between social and asocial violence. Threat displays versus pre-assault indicators. Maybe. I might go into reading terrain instead.
The other element in this equation is YOU. Violence is used for specific purposes. As such, it has its own logic. Incidents of violence are chaotic because you have multiple people in an adrenalized state that is unfamiliar to at least one of them. It's not that violence doesn't have rules, it's that you likely don't know them.
Remember, here, that I am not saying 'rules' in a game context, i.e. artificial constructs designed to control a person's behavior. I mean rules in the sense that there is a cause-and-effect relationship. These are rules for prediction, not rules of behavior.
Violence is used for specific purposes. Each incident has specific goals. Dollars to feed a bad drug habit in resource predation versus gaining or clarifying status in a Monkey Dance for example. It also has specific parameters. With a few exceptions, the druggie wants to avoid withdrawals, so he doesn't want to get caught (usually-- see Fleisher's "Beggars and Thieves" for the interesting detail that most hustlers choose to go to jail for specific reasons). He can't afford to be injured, because then others will prey on him. In a MD, the primary parameter is to avoid humiliation at all cost.
Another factor mandating predictability is that violence is a high-risk strategy. When you are doing something that is dangerous, and you have a strategy that works, it is really hard and really dangerous to try something new and untested. MOs are reliable for a reason.
So now it's about you. The goals and parameters paradigm create a subconscious risk-reward math for the bad guy. What rewards for what kind of crimes do you offer and what is the risk you present?
MD
Are you a young man? Who hangs out with other young men? While drinking? Do you go places where said young men hang out? Then there is some potential for MD. If you are a little older, your Monkey Dances are likely executed with words and office politics.
GMD
Remember there are three categories.
The bonding type is rare but can possibly target anybody. Your risk increases if you spend time where territories are in dispute (whether the edge of gang territory, war zones or sports bars) and/or you are easily identified as an outsider.
Boundary Setting should only come up if you regularly intervene in stranger's problems. LEOs, Social Workers...
Betrayal. Partner, unless you are a member of a violent group AND they have reason to believe you have betrayed them, you don't have to worry about this one.
EBD
This one will only come up if you violate the rules of a group and will only go violent if you violate either a major rule (e.g. betrayal) or break the rules of a violent group. And how violent will depend on the group. So, as long as you stay in your group, you know how to behave and what to expect. Educational Beat Down shouldn't be a problem. If, however you travel to or liaise with groups you don't know well, there is some risk. Risk goes up exponentially with your arrogance.
SSS
Because it is intended to break the rules of social violence, everyone is slightly vulnerable. That said, this is a pattern pretty much exclusive to violent criminal subcultures. If you don't spend time around such people, your risk is minimal.
Resource Predator
If you look like you have money (some money, not much-- homeless people rob each other all the time) and you don't look like you'd be a problem (easy to intimidate either psychologically or physically) you're a target for muggers. There are lots of behaviors that can raise your risk-- not paying attention, getting drunk, being alone in a high-risk locations. That's all standard self-defense advice.
Process Predator
In some ways, this is the hardest to narrow down the victim profiles. The process predator is idiosyncratic. For example, someone who gets addicted to the status seeking show (SSS) may prefer to assault, humiliate and kill or cripple big, strong, men. He has learned over time that sudden ferocity trumps skill or physicality and it is simply worth more reputation, and feels more satisfying, to beat a big man. Another may choose his victims for his own safety. An opportunistic rapist may target any vulnerable or small woman who piques his interest...and another rapist may only target women who subconsciously remind him of his mother. Generally, though, people who don't look like they will put up a fight are the safest bet for the predator; and most want an inner weakness or emotional lability. They want to see a victim cry, scream and beg.
Most in-shape martial athletes are, at most, on the target list for a Monkey Dance. The safest and most avoidable. If you teach self-defense you have to look at each of your student's with predator's eyes (all the different types of bad guys) to determine what they are likely to face.
ROUND TRIP PART 29--LET THEM EAT CAKE
LET THEM EAT CAKE ROUND TRIP PART 29
I am drooling.
I am standing there in the bakery section of Whole Foods lusting after pies, tarts, donuts, pastries, bear claws, and strudels. I've bitten thru my bottom lip. Other shoppers have very obviously given me wide berth. Kids are pointing.
See, I've pretty much eliminated most carbs from my diet. Especially the bread carbs. No buns, no cornbread, no croissant, no scones, and no sweet rolls.
No soft tabs of butter melting on a golden stack of pancakes. No fresh from the oven Southern biscuits. No straight from the can cookie dough.
Also, and this is probably obvious to most of you, but I'm also not supposed to eat candy, ice cream and other ever-so-delicious treats. That stuff is definitely not on the approved list.
I oughta know...I checked....several times.
What would I do for a Klondike Bar? You don't wanna know.
Those scenes in the movies where the guy's crawling thru the desert? And all he wants is a drink of water? That's pretty much me, but I'd like just an ever so teeny tiny spoonful of the icing they put on a Cinnabon.
Fortunately I have been blessed with an iron discipline. Okay, it's a little rusty I admit, but down deep it's still there. I have come this far. I have used mind over mattress to get me up and moving in the morning, forced myself into the gym to sling some weights around, and challenged myself to beat up Tito, my grappling dummy.
Aside from a few minor setbacks I have stayed at it consistently. But now it's time to ratchet it up. Stoke the fire.
Starting this week I am severely restricting calories. Say 'NO' to carbs. I will increase the amount of water I drink each day. I must add more cardio, and now that warmer weather is here I have no excuses. Some power walking perhaps, or maybe some hikes on the trails near my house.
Maybe add some weight to a backpack?
The journey of a thousand miles begins with one step. So now I must step away from this sinful, seductive bakery section. Get thee behind me. Honestly I don't even remember walking over here.
But now I gotta go. Besides, somebody's complained to the manager.
I am drooling.
I am standing there in the bakery section of Whole Foods lusting after pies, tarts, donuts, pastries, bear claws, and strudels. I've bitten thru my bottom lip. Other shoppers have very obviously given me wide berth. Kids are pointing.
See, I've pretty much eliminated most carbs from my diet. Especially the bread carbs. No buns, no cornbread, no croissant, no scones, and no sweet rolls.
No soft tabs of butter melting on a golden stack of pancakes. No fresh from the oven Southern biscuits. No straight from the can cookie dough.
Also, and this is probably obvious to most of you, but I'm also not supposed to eat candy, ice cream and other ever-so-delicious treats. That stuff is definitely not on the approved list.
I oughta know...I checked....several times.
What would I do for a Klondike Bar? You don't wanna know.
Those scenes in the movies where the guy's crawling thru the desert? And all he wants is a drink of water? That's pretty much me, but I'd like just an ever so teeny tiny spoonful of the icing they put on a Cinnabon.
Fortunately I have been blessed with an iron discipline. Okay, it's a little rusty I admit, but down deep it's still there. I have come this far. I have used mind over mattress to get me up and moving in the morning, forced myself into the gym to sling some weights around, and challenged myself to beat up Tito, my grappling dummy.
Aside from a few minor setbacks I have stayed at it consistently. But now it's time to ratchet it up. Stoke the fire.
Starting this week I am severely restricting calories. Say 'NO' to carbs. I will increase the amount of water I drink each day. I must add more cardio, and now that warmer weather is here I have no excuses. Some power walking perhaps, or maybe some hikes on the trails near my house.
Maybe add some weight to a backpack?
The journey of a thousand miles begins with one step. So now I must step away from this sinful, seductive bakery section. Get thee behind me. Honestly I don't even remember walking over here.
But now I gotta go. Besides, somebody's complained to the manager.
Brain Storming with Marc
One of the things I like about hanging out with Marc MacYoung are the long conversations. He's a thinker with wide experience and we've seen a lot of the same problems but from different sides and different magnifications. The synthesis of ideas is intense.
A few weeks ago, he taught a class at the Firearms Academy of Seattle. It was my chance to meet Marty and Gila, so I tagged along. The class was good, but the conversations were amazing.
(Do NOT take a bet with an attorney. He would not be betting unless he had insider information.)
At one point in the class, Marc asked, "How do you not get stabbed?" And let the class mull over it.
Later that night, I ran with the question. I liked it. It's only limited if you think it is. Between the two of us we came up with a pretty good list. Not definitive, I'm sure we missed some things. And there are places where we disagree about the order, but generally, in order of importance:
HOW NOT TO GET STABBED
And be aware, right here, that almost all of this from de-escalate on comes from the viewpoint of a male martial athlete. A victim being intimidated to a secondary crime scene goes into a different flowchart and may have to make different choices. A knife suddenly at you neck and the words, "Give me your purse" are not the same situation as the same knife and the words, "Come with me. Don't make a scene."
5. Brainstem. If it is going to engagement, you take out the brainstem. Get this, all of the physical responses are low percentage, and there is a matrix somewhere of ease of execution, likelihood to work and whether it finishes or delays the situation. This will be heavily influenced by your skill and your training. EV has long arms and great power and has made a practice of hitting brainstems shots from a number of angles. A different individual may or may not be able to make it work.
6. Positioning. Done properly gives you options and protects you without tying up your hands.
7. Compromise structure. This may be better than positioning or worse than limb disabling or not. I think where this goes on the list depends a lot on your fighting personality. But either destroying a leg or twisting the spine have their uses. And their dangers.
8. Disabling the limb. If you can pull it off.
9. Defanging the snake. Disarming in other words. Technically difficult and low percentage, but the big change from a lethal encounter to an unarmed encounter moves it up the matrix.
10. Controlling the weapon arm. Might buy you a second, maybe two, but it generally ties up (unless you do it by positioning) two of your hands to his one. To think that someone is 'so focused on the knife he will forget to hit you' is what we call wishful thinking. It is not strategy.
11. Simple blocking. Lot's of issues with it. Reactive so it tends to be too slow, doesn't finish anything or even slow anything down. So if it works, and that's a crap shoot, you are in exactly the same place you were.
12. Simple pain. I have no problem with adding pain. For that matter you can stack as many options as you can handle. Use them simultaneously. But counting on just pain, whether a pressure point or a shin kick to stop someone adrenalized to use a knife is very, very low percentage.
Not definitive, not absolute. Especially not prescriptive. I think I got more out of arguing where to place these than I did from the list itself.
But there was one other thing, and I want you to look at it-- it's not a perfect correlation but it looks very much like most training spends effort in the opposite order of effectiveness, or near enough. Far more hours in most schools are spent on blocking than on positioning, for instance. Is this because of misplaced priorities? Or a lazy tendency to teach the things that are easiest to teach regardless of effectiveness? Or some belief that the low percentage options require more training so we train them more. But I don't think the math works on that excuse.
More to think about.
A few weeks ago, he taught a class at the Firearms Academy of Seattle. It was my chance to meet Marty and Gila, so I tagged along. The class was good, but the conversations were amazing.
(Do NOT take a bet with an attorney. He would not be betting unless he had insider information.)
At one point in the class, Marc asked, "How do you not get stabbed?" And let the class mull over it.
Later that night, I ran with the question. I liked it. It's only limited if you think it is. Between the two of us we came up with a pretty good list. Not definitive, I'm sure we missed some things. And there are places where we disagree about the order, but generally, in order of importance:
HOW NOT TO GET STABBED
- Don't be the kind of person that someone else would want to stab. Marc likes to say that the two best knife defenses are to avoid are: 1) to avoid the drug culture and 2) don't sleep with other people's mates. Almost every stabbing I could think of was over something, and it was over something big enough to make it personal and it was between two people at least one of whom was cool with stabbing.
- Don't go places where people stab each other. This ties in directly to Marc Denny's "Avoid stupid places with stupid people doing stupid things." Random stabbings are rare, but they happen in predictable places.
- Run. If you don't have to engage, you don't engage. If you have time to ask yourself, "Should I engage?" the answer is, "No."
- De-escalate. If you can talk your way out, do so. Most of the time if you have an opportunity to talk, the goal is not to hurt you. The weapon is displayed to get you to hand over your wallet. So more accurately, some of the time I should say, "Don't escalate." Don't say anything stupid. If you challenge his manhood, he's likely to use the knife even if that wasn't his attention.
And be aware, right here, that almost all of this from de-escalate on comes from the viewpoint of a male martial athlete. A victim being intimidated to a secondary crime scene goes into a different flowchart and may have to make different choices. A knife suddenly at you neck and the words, "Give me your purse" are not the same situation as the same knife and the words, "Come with me. Don't make a scene."
5. Brainstem. If it is going to engagement, you take out the brainstem. Get this, all of the physical responses are low percentage, and there is a matrix somewhere of ease of execution, likelihood to work and whether it finishes or delays the situation. This will be heavily influenced by your skill and your training. EV has long arms and great power and has made a practice of hitting brainstems shots from a number of angles. A different individual may or may not be able to make it work.
6. Positioning. Done properly gives you options and protects you without tying up your hands.
7. Compromise structure. This may be better than positioning or worse than limb disabling or not. I think where this goes on the list depends a lot on your fighting personality. But either destroying a leg or twisting the spine have their uses. And their dangers.
8. Disabling the limb. If you can pull it off.
9. Defanging the snake. Disarming in other words. Technically difficult and low percentage, but the big change from a lethal encounter to an unarmed encounter moves it up the matrix.
10. Controlling the weapon arm. Might buy you a second, maybe two, but it generally ties up (unless you do it by positioning) two of your hands to his one. To think that someone is 'so focused on the knife he will forget to hit you' is what we call wishful thinking. It is not strategy.
11. Simple blocking. Lot's of issues with it. Reactive so it tends to be too slow, doesn't finish anything or even slow anything down. So if it works, and that's a crap shoot, you are in exactly the same place you were.
12. Simple pain. I have no problem with adding pain. For that matter you can stack as many options as you can handle. Use them simultaneously. But counting on just pain, whether a pressure point or a shin kick to stop someone adrenalized to use a knife is very, very low percentage.
Not definitive, not absolute. Especially not prescriptive. I think I got more out of arguing where to place these than I did from the list itself.
But there was one other thing, and I want you to look at it-- it's not a perfect correlation but it looks very much like most training spends effort in the opposite order of effectiveness, or near enough. Far more hours in most schools are spent on blocking than on positioning, for instance. Is this because of misplaced priorities? Or a lazy tendency to teach the things that are easiest to teach regardless of effectiveness? Or some belief that the low percentage options require more training so we train them more. But I don't think the math works on that excuse.
More to think about.
Training Blindness
Have to get this out of the way first. Most of the self-defense techniques I see taught don't take into account the essential nature of an assault. Not just ignoring the fact that it is fast, hard and from surprise. Most ignore the simple fact that the bad guy doesn't do just one thing and then wait for you to solve the problem. If, anywhere in your solution, there is time for him to do something, the bad guy will be doing something. And that 'something' will change the dynamics of each step of your complicated, memorized technique.
I've seen this in an eight-move technique to escape from a wall pin that wound up in a nifty armlock. Even at a 90% effectiveness rate for each step, let's see, .9x.9x.9x.9x.9x.9x.9x.9= .43. Or thereabouts More likely to fail than to work even if you are very good. And what really annoyed me is that there was a two-move option to get to the same result... but the instructor didn't consider that elegant. Dammit, simple is elegant. And effective is beautiful.
Also seen it in a two move escape from a grab (at least it was a grab that actually happens, there's that at least). The second move actually worked okay without the first move. The first move did nothing except afford me an opportunity to punch him in the face while he wasted time.
Had to get that out of the way even though it only has a weak connection with training blindness. Maybe the inability to see the artificiality?
I don't teach new things. On some level, everyone knows the things I teach. You couldn't survive without at least some gut feeling about this stuff. The running class on classifications of violence-- we all knew that the monkey dance of a drunk college kid in a bar was different than a stranger rape. We all knew (if we thought about it for a second) that robbing to get the money to get the drugs was different than working out a self-esteem issue. And if we ever really thought about the problems criminals need to solve we would come up with efficient criminal reactions to those problems, not martial arts solutions.
So it's not new, just making the information conscious and organized enough to use.
But one of the most basic is the hardest. And that is simply seeing.
Went to grab a throat and the student immediately ran through her memory rolodex to do what she was taught. Which did not have a hope in hell of working. It was too complicated, didn't take into account our strength disparity... Hopeless. All the technique would have done is distract her while the bad guy escalated his evil.
And here's the blind part: She knew it. Like every student, she has been moving her whole body for her whole life. She's seen other people move and, I assume, felt them. One glance and she knew it wouldn't work, anymore than any chi master will ever lift an engine block without touching. She knew and turned off her eyes and her brain and did what she was 'supposed' to do anyway.
Training makes you blind. Not at first. At first you see all kinds of new things. The world gets bigger. And that's a huge component of getting good. The 'Orient' step of the OODA loop is one of the places you can freeze and it must be trained. A baby doesn't automatically know that an object getting bigger is getting closer. You have to learn to identify the weight shift before a kick. All good.
But the longer you stay in one sandbox, the more you forget all of the other things outside the sandbox. Once you remember you forget to see. Once you start living in your head, you quit living in the world.
Going back to the defense that didn't work-- had she applied the exact same motion as the first move of the sequence at a slightly different angle she would have prevented the grab and jabbed me in the throat. There was absolutely nothing wrong with the physics or body mechanics of the move. Except for where they were applied and the assumption that 4 moves at 90% effectiveness would mean 360% effectiveness. When it is actually 65.6%.
A slight angle change and you get two solid effects with a single motion. (My goal is four with each motion). As opposed to four motions to get one effect with no finish.
The student already knew this. She could see it. It was right in front of her eyes. Except she couldn't. Seeing a problem she knew from training, she remembered the response from training. In all of the years of training somehow the fact that it was only working because her partners had also been brainwashed into letting it work drifted out of consciousness and it became 'the thing to do.'
With that, everything she knew about physics, about bodies, about the way angles cut into weakness (still tired, not using words gooder-- basically it's easier to move the end of the lever and even easier if you 'cut' while doing it and even easier if you move) just disappeared down some mental rabbit hole. For combative and self-defense purposes, this student was essentially blind. And her training had made her that way.
It's not so simple, because everything I did point out was in her system. Any system that has survived for any length of time has the stuff you need in it. Darwin had a lot to say about things, until rule of law spread and even then for a long while until dojo arashi became frowned upon. (Anyone want to propose legislation that legitimizes dueling as an alternative to lawsuits?)
So not only did she naturally know this stuff, the system she trained in was based on it and somehow failed to pass it on in a useful way. How many instructors can you think of who can explain the principles of how techniques work but the techniques taught violate those principles? Too many.
This kind of blindness is hereditary. An instructor who has it will pass it on. In demonstrations, the blindness of his students becomes part of the reason his techniques work. A student who can actually see is an incredible threat to his ability and status
And it is all completely unnecessary. The good stuff is there. You just look for it, and then look for where it really fits. See.
I've seen this in an eight-move technique to escape from a wall pin that wound up in a nifty armlock. Even at a 90% effectiveness rate for each step, let's see, .9x.9x.9x.9x.9x.9x.9x.9= .43. Or thereabouts More likely to fail than to work even if you are very good. And what really annoyed me is that there was a two-move option to get to the same result... but the instructor didn't consider that elegant. Dammit, simple is elegant. And effective is beautiful.
Also seen it in a two move escape from a grab (at least it was a grab that actually happens, there's that at least). The second move actually worked okay without the first move. The first move did nothing except afford me an opportunity to punch him in the face while he wasted time.
Had to get that out of the way even though it only has a weak connection with training blindness. Maybe the inability to see the artificiality?
I don't teach new things. On some level, everyone knows the things I teach. You couldn't survive without at least some gut feeling about this stuff. The running class on classifications of violence-- we all knew that the monkey dance of a drunk college kid in a bar was different than a stranger rape. We all knew (if we thought about it for a second) that robbing to get the money to get the drugs was different than working out a self-esteem issue. And if we ever really thought about the problems criminals need to solve we would come up with efficient criminal reactions to those problems, not martial arts solutions.
So it's not new, just making the information conscious and organized enough to use.
But one of the most basic is the hardest. And that is simply seeing.
Went to grab a throat and the student immediately ran through her memory rolodex to do what she was taught. Which did not have a hope in hell of working. It was too complicated, didn't take into account our strength disparity... Hopeless. All the technique would have done is distract her while the bad guy escalated his evil.
And here's the blind part: She knew it. Like every student, she has been moving her whole body for her whole life. She's seen other people move and, I assume, felt them. One glance and she knew it wouldn't work, anymore than any chi master will ever lift an engine block without touching. She knew and turned off her eyes and her brain and did what she was 'supposed' to do anyway.
Training makes you blind. Not at first. At first you see all kinds of new things. The world gets bigger. And that's a huge component of getting good. The 'Orient' step of the OODA loop is one of the places you can freeze and it must be trained. A baby doesn't automatically know that an object getting bigger is getting closer. You have to learn to identify the weight shift before a kick. All good.
But the longer you stay in one sandbox, the more you forget all of the other things outside the sandbox. Once you remember you forget to see. Once you start living in your head, you quit living in the world.
Going back to the defense that didn't work-- had she applied the exact same motion as the first move of the sequence at a slightly different angle she would have prevented the grab and jabbed me in the throat. There was absolutely nothing wrong with the physics or body mechanics of the move. Except for where they were applied and the assumption that 4 moves at 90% effectiveness would mean 360% effectiveness. When it is actually 65.6%.
A slight angle change and you get two solid effects with a single motion. (My goal is four with each motion). As opposed to four motions to get one effect with no finish.
The student already knew this. She could see it. It was right in front of her eyes. Except she couldn't. Seeing a problem she knew from training, she remembered the response from training. In all of the years of training somehow the fact that it was only working because her partners had also been brainwashed into letting it work drifted out of consciousness and it became 'the thing to do.'
With that, everything she knew about physics, about bodies, about the way angles cut into weakness (still tired, not using words gooder-- basically it's easier to move the end of the lever and even easier if you 'cut' while doing it and even easier if you move) just disappeared down some mental rabbit hole. For combative and self-defense purposes, this student was essentially blind. And her training had made her that way.
It's not so simple, because everything I did point out was in her system. Any system that has survived for any length of time has the stuff you need in it. Darwin had a lot to say about things, until rule of law spread and even then for a long while until dojo arashi became frowned upon. (Anyone want to propose legislation that legitimizes dueling as an alternative to lawsuits?)
So not only did she naturally know this stuff, the system she trained in was based on it and somehow failed to pass it on in a useful way. How many instructors can you think of who can explain the principles of how techniques work but the techniques taught violate those principles? Too many.
This kind of blindness is hereditary. An instructor who has it will pass it on. In demonstrations, the blindness of his students becomes part of the reason his techniques work. A student who can actually see is an incredible threat to his ability and status
And it is all completely unnecessary. The good stuff is there. You just look for it, and then look for where it really fits. See.
London Debrief
That's London, Ontario. In Canada. Not the Uk one.
It's been busy.
Came in exhausted on the fourth. Had to wait at Customs. Seems I left a pamphlet from the "Armed Citizen's Legal Defense Network" in my bag. Got some questions from the Canadian Border Service. That was the first Thursday.
Friday-- Walks, explore and settle in, then an evening class at the local BJJ school. Did a little dirty rolling. Had to take it easy. Still in the big knee brace, still pre-surgery... but I love playing.
Saturday: Day One of the regular seminar, Intro to Violence. Usual stuff-- the three long-assed-talks; fighting to the goal; efficient movement; learning to see... That stuff. Didn't go into the usual detail on Power Generation because I wanted to get to counter assault, so only structure and stealing. Didn't get into twitch power. Other cool thing--when I was demonstrating blindfolded infighting, they sent two in on me. Wish I had film of that. Then conversation and narghila at Crazy Joe's.
Sunday: Day Two. In the cabinet making shop again, but with a little twist. Chris had a room they were tearing down so we were able to do the mass brawls without worrying about structural damage. The go signal was throwing one of the students through the dry wall.
This brings up something. I like training hard, fast and with intensity, but don't do so in a seminar format. Seminars I focus on intensity. Chris said that some of the people who didn't show seemed afraid it would be a 'slugfest.' I don't see it. Injury rate is very low. But that we do play in dangerous environments, and do drill with mass brawls and blindfolded infighting-- there's definitely a perception there. Most people aren't ready to hear "You will be thrown through walls" and "It's really safe."
Monday: Day off. Writing and catch-up on correspondence.
Tuesday: Conflict Communications in the morning and another Dirty Rolling session with the London BJJ club in the evening.
Wednesday: ConCom in the morning. Then did an evening class for a local karate club. Then did some boxing. Kick boxing, technically, but I was in a knee brace, so I was just boxing. This was stupid, dumb, I know what you're gonna say. But it was a blast. I really miss playing with big skilled guys who are into contact.
Thursday: ConCom
Friday: ConCom. Then fencing. Now, fencing may be the worst possible thing for my knee, so I decided left hand only, no footwork.
Used my right hand some. And a little footwork (it's not something you can just turn off, evidently). Again, fun and again, clearly I'm not merely a martial artist, I'm a junkie. Addicts.
Saturday and Sunday: Logic of Violence. This seminar is growing and getting more powerful. Strangely, a couple of people who were worried about the physical aspects of Intro showed up to this since it was mostly verbal were affected at a deep emotional level. And, from a SD viewpoint, that's valid. Self-defense is far more difficult emotionally than physically. The mechanics, in other words, are simpler and for most people easier than the will aspects.
Which brings us to today. Quiet. Lunch with Steve, the head instructor at Twin Mountains (who got two gold medals in Malaysia-- congrats.) Otherwise, read and vegetate.
So 13 sessions in a little over a week. I'm a little tired. I'll get back on my regular writing schedule soon.
It's been busy.
Came in exhausted on the fourth. Had to wait at Customs. Seems I left a pamphlet from the "Armed Citizen's Legal Defense Network" in my bag. Got some questions from the Canadian Border Service. That was the first Thursday.
Friday-- Walks, explore and settle in, then an evening class at the local BJJ school. Did a little dirty rolling. Had to take it easy. Still in the big knee brace, still pre-surgery... but I love playing.
Saturday: Day One of the regular seminar, Intro to Violence. Usual stuff-- the three long-assed-talks; fighting to the goal; efficient movement; learning to see... That stuff. Didn't go into the usual detail on Power Generation because I wanted to get to counter assault, so only structure and stealing. Didn't get into twitch power. Other cool thing--when I was demonstrating blindfolded infighting, they sent two in on me. Wish I had film of that. Then conversation and narghila at Crazy Joe's.
Sunday: Day Two. In the cabinet making shop again, but with a little twist. Chris had a room they were tearing down so we were able to do the mass brawls without worrying about structural damage. The go signal was throwing one of the students through the dry wall.
This brings up something. I like training hard, fast and with intensity, but don't do so in a seminar format. Seminars I focus on intensity. Chris said that some of the people who didn't show seemed afraid it would be a 'slugfest.' I don't see it. Injury rate is very low. But that we do play in dangerous environments, and do drill with mass brawls and blindfolded infighting-- there's definitely a perception there. Most people aren't ready to hear "You will be thrown through walls" and "It's really safe."
Monday: Day off. Writing and catch-up on correspondence.
Tuesday: Conflict Communications in the morning and another Dirty Rolling session with the London BJJ club in the evening.
Wednesday: ConCom in the morning. Then did an evening class for a local karate club. Then did some boxing. Kick boxing, technically, but I was in a knee brace, so I was just boxing. This was stupid, dumb, I know what you're gonna say. But it was a blast. I really miss playing with big skilled guys who are into contact.
Thursday: ConCom
Friday: ConCom. Then fencing. Now, fencing may be the worst possible thing for my knee, so I decided left hand only, no footwork.
Used my right hand some. And a little footwork (it's not something you can just turn off, evidently). Again, fun and again, clearly I'm not merely a martial artist, I'm a junkie. Addicts.
Saturday and Sunday: Logic of Violence. This seminar is growing and getting more powerful. Strangely, a couple of people who were worried about the physical aspects of Intro showed up to this since it was mostly verbal were affected at a deep emotional level. And, from a SD viewpoint, that's valid. Self-defense is far more difficult emotionally than physically. The mechanics, in other words, are simpler and for most people easier than the will aspects.
Which brings us to today. Quiet. Lunch with Steve, the head instructor at Twin Mountains (who got two gold medals in Malaysia-- congrats.) Otherwise, read and vegetate.
So 13 sessions in a little over a week. I'm a little tired. I'll get back on my regular writing schedule soon.
News, Articles and Updates
